Categories
Educational Outreach

Ignacio Moore and Bill Hopkins lead a study abroad trip to Ecuador

From VT News

Ten Virginia Tech undergraduate students better hold onto their hats this summer as they plunge down Amazonian river systems into the heart of Ecuador. At the helm of their canoes will be Global Change Center researchers Ignacio Moore and Bill Hopkins.

As part of a university-wide effort to promote study abroad, experiential learning, and undergraduate research, the students will witness the politics, history, culture, biology, and conservation issues in the South American country from May 16 to June 7 .

airport_800
Ten undergraduates and two faculty members from Virginia Tech pose at the airport before boarding a flight to Ecuador. From left to right: Emily Reasor, Christy Nelson, Justin Matias, Elizabeth Zadnic, Alex Flevarakis, Caman Skelton, Lennon Ross, Caroline Tribble, Dr. Ignacio Moore, Matt Lacey, and Dr. Bill Hopkins.

Ecuador is chock full of Andean peaks, rain and cloud forests, and striking wildlife such as jaguars, poison dart frogs, toucans, and pink river dolphins. Follow the students’ adventures at the Global Change Center’s website.

For the course, students had to work in groups to design their own research projects to be carried out during the trip.

Students will use camera traps to investigate the prevalence of large cats, including jaguars and pumas, in the rainforest and cloud forest sites. These cats are often hunted by poachers and ranchers and are rarely seen. Camera traps will let researchers document their presence and behavior.

Working with Brook Kennedy, an associate professor of industrial design, the students will investigate the microscopic world using Macronauts, a macro lens that can be mounted on the camera of a smart phone camera.

In addition, the itinerary includes visits to the Sani Isla community run by the Quichua and the Shiripuno community of the Waorani. Both of these indigenous groups live in much the same way as they have done for hundreds of years.

The trip was organized by Moore as part of the Tropical Biology and Conservation in Ecuador course, cross listed through the departments of biological sciences in the College of Science and fisheries and wildlife conservation in the College of Natural Resources and the Environment.

“The students will visit one of the most biodiverse, but also threatened, areas on earth. These types of study abroad experiences give students the chance to see in the real world what they have read about it books,” said Moore. “Our aim is not just to be tourists but to conduct research and learn about how conservation efforts rely on interactions between scientists, local peoples, multinational corporations, and governments.”

Related story

Students team with Ecuadorean tribes to learn most effective plants for treating infection

Categories
Accolades Interfaces of Global Change IGEP

Dean Karen DePauw honored at first annual Interfaces of Global Change research symposium

From VT News

If you’re going to develop an interdisciplinary graduate research program at Virginia Tech, it’s good to have a champion of interdisciplinary education. In this case, Karen DePauw, the university’s  vice president and dean of graduate education, serves as that champion.

On April 22, DePauw was honored with an award in her name at the first research symposium held by the Interfaces of Global Change interdisciplinary graduate education program.

During the symposium’s opening remarks, Bill Hopkins, the director of the Global Change Center at Virginia Tech, which houses the graduate program, revealed the inaugural student award: The Karen P. DePauw Outstanding Interdisciplinary Presentation Award.

wepkingaward
Carl Wepking (center), with Dr. Bill Hopkins and Dean DePauw, receives the first Karen P. DePauw Award for outstanding presentation at the the IGC Graduate Symposium.

“There’s no more appropriate way to honor the person that has supported the growth and interdisciplinary thinking of our community,” said Hopkins, who is also a professor of fish and wildlife conservation in the College of Natural Resources and Environment.

“Dean DePauw is a tremendous advocate for interdisciplinary research, and I feel fortunate to have her as dean of the graduate school,” said this year’s award recipient Carl Wepking of Lancaster, Wisconsin, a Ph.D. student in biological sciences in the College of Science.

As an Interfaces of Global Change Fellow, Wepking studies how antibiotic use in agricultural livestock affects soil ecosystems.

Wepking, along with the other fellows, spent the day working with faculty to further achieve the center’s mission, which is to advance interdisciplinary scholarship and education to address critical global changes impacting the environment and society. This includes taking a multitude of perspectives to tackle complex problems surrounding climate change, pollution, invasive species, disease, and habitat loss.

“Dr. DePauw has helped create a culture of interdisciplinary thinking and training at Virginia Tech,” Hopkins said. “Her vision has facilitated new interactions among faculty and students who are working together across campus to solve complicated problems ranging from obesity and infectious disease to water pollution and climate change. The programs are also helping us attract some of the best and brightest graduate students to our university because students are thirsty for these new opportunities.”

There are now more than 14 interdisciplinary programs around campus, including the Interfaces of Global Change.

“The goal of transformative graduate education is to better prepare our graduate students for multiple careers and to solve complex problems facing society in the 21st century,” DePauw said. “Skills needed to do this include interdisciplinary thinking and transdisciplinary understanding, teamwork, collaboration, communication, and leadership, to name a few. These skills are embedded within these graduate programs and are strongly embraced by the Interfaces of Global Change.”

The symposium, which was held in the Fralin Life Science Institute, highlighted the latest research from the program’s graduate student fellows, who come from various disciplines, including biological sciences, engineering, entomology, fish and wildlife, and forest resources and environmental conservation.

As part of the Global Change Center, the fellows shared their work with the center’s affiliated faculty, who also hail from range of disciplines, such as history, crop and soil sciences, statistics, computer science, geosciences, and plant pathology.

Written by Cassandra Hockman, Fralin Life Science Institute.

[hr]

 

Categories
Conservation Interfaces of Global Change IGEP Student Spotlight

Cathy Jachowski defends her dissertation: first IGC graduate!

On Monday, May 9, 2016, Cathy Jachowski successfully defended her dissertaton in Fralin Auditorium. Her public seminar in Fralin Auditorium was titled, “Effects of Land Use and Parasitism on Hellbender Salamanders: A Multilevel Perspective”.

Cathy, a member of the Hopkins Lab, is the first Interfaces of Global Change graduate student to complete a doctoral program at Virginia Tech! Congratulations, Cathy!


cathydefense

 

See more defense photos on FLICKER
[hr]

Categories
Biodiversity Conservation News

Red-cockaded woodpecker uses fungus to create tree cavities

From VT News

Home decor has never been so useful.

An endangered woodpecker carries wood-eating fungi into its tree cavity home that ultimately help to expand the home’s size, according to a multi-institutional team led by a Virginia Tech researcher.

The finding, which comes after more than two years of experimental research in a protected area on Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune in North Carolina, was recently published in the journal Proceedings of the Royal Society B.

Researchers determined that the red-cockaded woodpecker carries spores from the fungus Porodaedalea pini and other fungal species on its beak, wings, and feet and introduces them to cavities of trees that are not yet infected, according to senior author Jeff Walters, the Harold Bailey Professor of Biological Sciences in the College of Science.

Michelle Jusino, lead author on the paper and Walter’s former doctoral student, swabbed the beaks, wings, and feet of 11 woodpeckers and sampled 60 tree cavities, half of which were not accessible to the woodpeckers.  The holes that were accessible to the birds had the fungi growing in them, while the others did not, indicating that the birds play a role in dispersal.

“Our findings provide the first experimental evidence of a symbiosis between woodpeckers and fungi, two groups of organisms who are often assumed to work together,” said Jusino, who is now a research wildlife biologist with the U.S. Forest Service.  “The common assumption is that the fungi help the birds, and that very well may be the case as well, but here were have shown that the birds help the fungi. The next step is to show that the fungi found in the excavations actually do help the birds complete the difficult task of excavating a cavity in the heartwood of a living pine tree.”

Walters, who has studied the red-cockaded woodpecker for almost 40 years, said these longleaf pine cavities are extremely important to the bird’s survival.  As cooperative breeders, many woodpeckers live at home with their parents until they are able to acquire their own cavities. Building a new cavity is a process that could take as long as 13 years.

“In order to create their homes in the preferred longleaf pine, these birds must dig a tunnel through the outer surface of sap wood, and the tree responds by releasing sap that could trap and kill the bird if it is not careful,” said Walters, who is also affiliated with the Global Change Center at Virginia Tech and the Fralin Life Science Institute. “Once the bird gets through this layer, it reaches heartwood which is a bit less risky but still takes years to excavate.”

The wood-eating fungus appears to speed up the process.

Creating one’s own home is desirable because only home-owning birds have a chance to breed.  Only two birds (one female and one male) breed per family, and this ranking is based on seniority.

The red-cockaded woodpecker is the only woodpecker that chooses to make its home in living pine trees, and the reason for this preference is still a mystery to scientists. To accommodate the birds, the trees must be at least 100 years old and relatively healthy —when a tree dies, it is abandoned.

The highly specific habitat preference does not bode well for the bird’s endangered status, but in past years Walters and his group, with help from a National Science Foundation grant and other funding from the Department of Defense, have assisted by drilling holes in the trees, creating hundreds of new cavities and attracting 83 new family groups to the Camp Lejeune area.  This management project was repeated with populations in the Sandhills of North Carolina and Eglin Air Force Base in Florida, and their successes led the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to declare these two populations recovered.

With a little help from their friends — both fungi and humans — these quirky birds have a better chance at survival.

[hr]

Story by Lindsay Key

Categories
News

Virginia Tech’s aviary visited by Congressman Morgan Griffith

From VT News

An international birder who has been trying to get some migratory bird legislation passed, Congressman Morgan Griffith on Wednesday visited Virginia Tech’s new aviary on the Blacksburg campus to learn about its research.

Regarding his interest in avian legislation, Griffith (R-VA)  joined Congressman Mike Quigley (D-IL) in introducing the Federal Bird-Safe Buildings Act (H.R. 2280) on May 12, 2015. Applying strictly to federal government buildings, the legislation requires new buildings to include bird-safe building materials and design features to the maximum extent possible. It also requires the use of similar measures on existing federal buildings where practicable when the buildings are being substantially renovated.

Griffith’s longtime interest in birds prompted his visit  to the Research Aviary, which Virginia Tech’s College of Natural Resources and Environment officially opened last fall. It is one of few such university facilities in the region and is used by researchers across campus who need controlled space for studies.

“Virginia Tech has incredible strengths in avian biology, ecology, and conservation,” said William Hopkins, professor of wildlife conservation who heads up the facility. “In the past, we have relied on fieldwork and lab experiments, but some critical questions require intermediate conditions, where captive birds are able to fly and behave in social groups. This facility, where we have some control but also seminatural conditions, bridges the gap between field and lab studies.”

Hopkins’ doctoral student Sydney Hope of Howell, New Jersey, showed Griffith the wood ducks that were hatched out of incubators and explained how she is examining the effects of varying temperatures on the early development of bird behaviors that are ultimately important to early survival.

She showed Griffith the exploratory arena she created to study the social behavior of wood ducks. Hope’s research examines how bold and exploratory the ducks are.

Griffith said he tries to plan his vacations around worldwide bird watching. “When I go into a new area, I find it helpful to meet up with a local birder who can show me the hot spots,” he told Hopkins. “With our region now marketing itself as an outdoor destination, I hope Virginia Tech can help get a system whereby visiting birders can easily connect with local bird guides to see what we have.”

Hopkins explained that researchers are using the aviary to solve a spectrum of big problems. An affiliate of the Fralin Life Science Institute and director of the Global Change Center, Hopkins said, “Virginia Tech researchers are studying the role of birds in dispersal of seeds from invasive plants; transmission of disease; how weather, pollution, and climate change affect bird reproduction; and behavioral/social patterns.”

Virginia Tech’s state-of-the-art facility has 16 identical aviary rooms. “We can conduct experiments and replicate them in statistically robust designs,” Hopkins said. “Each room can house a small flock of songbirds, such as finches, sparrows, and starlings, or family groups of species like wood ducks so we can observe adults raising their young, for instance.”

Other features include partial roofing of each room with an outer, mesh-enclosed area so the birds can experience daylight cycles and natural temperature changes but remain sheltered from extreme weather and predators. The birds can be observed through one-way glass panels.

The aviary is on the western edge of campus in a research complex known as Center Woods, on university-owned agricultural field station land. Built with $700,000 in internal funding by the College of Natural Resources and Environment and the Department of Fish and Wildlife Conservation, the facility is used for collaborations with other Virginia Tech colleges and other universities to study many bird species.

[hr]

Story by Lynn Davis

Categories
Uncategorized

VT faculty explore the “Resilient Earth” Destination Area

From VT News

May 5, 2016

When faculty members from different disciplines gather, they learn one another’s language.

So the process continued Wednesday as two groups of about 100 faculty members each joined at the Graduate Life Center to discuss the Adaptive Brain and Behavior Across the Lifespan destination area, and the Resilient Earth Systems destination area.

The sessions are part of a continuing process to identify difficult problems in society — areas that Virginia Tech can tackle with established, cross-disciplinary expertise to improve the human condition while also positioning the university as an important hub for research, scholarship, and learning.

Karen Roberto, a University Distinguished Professor in the College of Liberal Arts and Human Sciences, provided the 30,000-foot general overview for the “adaptive brain” session, while William Hopkins, a professor in the College of Natural Resources and Environment, briefed faculty in the Resilient Earth Systems workshop.

Along with participants in the National Capital Region, faculty members were asked to think about large societal problems – for example, brain function in various contexts of health, injury, or disease, within a variety of societal and economic contexts — to add substance to the destination areas.

“The end result is to improve people’s lives,” Roberto said. “Today we want to further define what this area might look like and consider the opportunities we may address.”

Hopkins_DA mtg
William Hopkins, a professor in the College of Natural Resources and Environment, facilitates a table discussion during the Resilient Earth Systems destination area meeting.

Later in the day, Hopkins touched on challenges of providing food, water, and energy to a growing population, and provided examples of potential problem spaces where Virginia Tech could have a strong impact, such as antibiotic resistance, invasive species, and habitat loss.

“Every problem we mentioned involves real people and we need to have sociologists, economists, and other interdisciplinary people working in these areas,” Hopkins said. “As we move forward, we need to think about solving problems that benefit society and the environment.”

The overview talks were webcast and should soon be available for viewing. An announcement about a new Destination Area website where the collected information will be available is coming next week.

Meanwhile, the next two destination area sessions are scheduled next week, with Data and Decision Sciences set for 2 p.m. to 4 p.m. Monday, and Integrated Security for 1:30 p.m. to 3:30 p.m. Tuesday. Both are in the Graduate Life Center, where faculty are encouraged to attend in person.

Faculty members in the National Capital Region have options to participate in the round tables via WebEX. Remote locations are set up in Room 103 in the Northern Virginia Center in Falls Church, the Foggy Bottom Room in the Virginia Tech Research Center-Arlington; and Potomac Room 310 at 1021 Prince St., Alexandria.

The overview talks and reporting sessions are also livestreamed.

[hr]

Story by Tracy Vosburgh

Categories
News

Accepting Applications: William R. Walker Graduate Research Fellow Award

Announcement:

The William R. Walker Graduate Research Fellow Award application for 2016 is now available (http://www.vwrrc.vt.edu/walker-award/).  It is intended for individuals pursuing graduate work in water resources who have an undergraduate degree that did not have a water resources emphasis, or individuals with work experience returning to graduate school to study water resources.  Applications are due May 20, 2016.


William R. Walker Graduate Research Fellow Award

Announcements and Application

Graduate students from Virginia Tech are invited each spring to submit applications to the Virginia Water Resources Research Center for the William R. Walker graduate fellowship. The fellowship is intended as an aid to persons who are preparing for a professional career in water resources. Individuals pursuing graduate work in a water resources field different from the field of emphasis as an undergraduate, or individuals with work experience returning to graduate school to study water resources are especially encouraged to apply.

The Water Center has offered the Walker Award since 1999. The awards are effective at the start of the fall semester each year.

Bill Walker portait by George Wills from May 2007 Water Central
Bill Walker

Funds can be used at the recipient’s discretion, during enrollment at a university as a student, for professional development (such as attending workshops and conferences) and purchasing materials that will enhance professional productivity (such as books and software).

Click here to download the application and view submission deadline.

For more information, contact: Dr. Kevin McGuire at kevin.mcguire@vt.edu or (540) 231-6017; or the main Water Center office at water@vt.edu or (540) 231-5624.

[hr]

Sketch of William Walker by George Wills of Blacksburg, Va.

Categories
Disease Science Communication

Deniers: Contesting the Science of Smoking

From The Atlantic

A decade after a judge ordered tobacco companies to acknowledge the dangers of low-tar cigarettes, they continue to dispute the scientific consensus.

In a landmark ruling nearly a decade ago, a federal judge ordered tobacco companies to stop lying.

After listening to 84 witnesses and perusing tens of thousands of exhibits, U.S. District Judge Gladys Kessler of the District of Columbia took a year to write a 1,652-page opinion detailing the companies’ elaborate strategy to deny the harmful effects of smoking.

“In short, [the companies] have marketed and sold their lethal product with zeal, with deception, with a single-minded focus on their financial success, and without regard for the human tragedy or social costs that success exacted,” Kessler wrote in United States of America v. Philip Morris USA.

Kessler noted that the Justice Department, in a racketeering lawsuit, had presented “overwhelming evidence” of a conspiracy to defraud the public. She ordered the companies to take a number of actions, including ceasing to claim there was such a thing as a low-tar cigarette that reduced the risk of disease. The evidence showed this simply was not true.

Yet in about a dozen pending lawsuits, Philip Morris continues to do just that. As of 2010, it still routinely argued that the nation’s top-selling cigarette, once known as Marlboro Lights and now called Marlboro Gold, reduces the risk of cancer.

To find scientists willing to make this claim, Philip Morris turned to consultants for the chemical industry. The experts Philip Morris hired work for firms whose scientists regularly contend in medical journals, courtrooms, and regulatory arenas that their clients’ chemical products pose little or no health risks to the public. The firms have been instrumental in delaying new regulations by criticizing the work of other scientists, and emphasizing the doubt inherent in health science. The resultant uncertainty has helped delay attempts by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to crack down on ubiquitous chemicals with known dangers, such as formaldehyde, arsenic, and hexavalent chromium.

The irony in this arrangement is that the tobacco industry pioneered such tactics. “The tobacco industry wrote the playbook for the rest of the industries,” said Matt Myers, president of the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids. “Whether it’s the chemical industry, whether its climate change … You see it in industry after industry.” Now, it’s hiring consultants who took its techniques and pushed them further in other industries, relying on their experience to contest the scientific consensus on the dangers of low-tar cigarettes.

The industry’s tactics continue to have catastrophic consequences. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention attribute 480,000 deaths each year to smoking, equal to one in every five deaths. Since 1964, when the U.S. Surgeon General warned that smoking caused cancer, the government estimates that tobacco has killed more than 20 million Americans. That is 15 times the number of Americans who have perished in all wars combined.

Although millions have quit, smoking continues to be the most preventable cause of death in the United States today.

Read the full story at The Atlantic

[hr]

Photo credit: Debora Cartagena, CDC

Categories
Global Change Research Water

Watershed flood-control strategies aided by new mapping approach

From VT News

It should come as no surprise that urban areas, with impenetrable rooftops and parking lots, contribute to flooding. But natural and manmade structures within the watersheds that serve urban and rural areas can influence the path and speed of water, for better or worse.

Landscape features, such as vegetative cover, soil type, and the steepness of hillsides, affect the magnitude and duration of only small floods, according to research by Beatriz “Tiz” Mogollón of Bogota, Colombia, who earned her master’s degree in fish and wildlife conservation from Virginia Tech’s College of Natural Resources and Environment in 2014. To regulate flooding, urbanized watersheds require engineered features, such as storm-water ponds, buffer strips, and other strategies for holding water.

Watersheds, as the name describes, are landforms that direct water towards streams and rivers. They can be huge, such as the six states that drain into the Chesapeake Bay, or only a few square miles, such as ridges that shed snow melt into a creek and from there into a river.

For her thesis research, Mogollón examined the landscape processes that influence river flooding to better understand the circumstances under which watersheds regulate flooding, as well as the prospects for managing floods by manipulating landscape structure. In collaboration with Professor Paul Angermeier, and Associate Professor Emmanuel Frimpong, and Research Scientist Amy Villamagna, all in the Department of Fish and Wildlife Conservation, she focused her analysis on 31 watersheds across Virginia and North Carolina that had at least 20 years of records about river flow.

The New River near McCoy
The New River, near McCoy, Virginia

Mogollón’s first study, published in the Feb. 1, 2016, Journal of Environmental Management, showed that larger floods cannot be managed by manipulating landscape features. She pointed out that urban watersheds have the potential for larger, quicker floods, but engineered features, such as constructed wetlands, grass swales, and storm-water ponds, can lower flood magnitudes in these areas.

In a second study, published in the March 16, 2016, Journal of the American Water Resources Association, Mogollón’s research showed that although annual precipitation has decreased since 1991 in the areas she studied, the river flow in some of the watersheds has had a tendency to increase rapidly. This “flashiness” has increased in urban areas that have lost forest cover and have few flood-management strategies. “Impervious cover pours water rapidly into creeks and rivers,” explained Angermeier, who is an affiliate of the Fralin Life Science Institute.

In a third study, published in the February 2016 issue of Ecological Indicators, Mogollón and colleagues mapped the capacities of technological and landscape attributes of watersheds to regulate floods. The research showed that strategic use of engineered and landscape structures results in smaller but longer-lasting flooding.

“Flooding doesn’t happen as quickly, so people and property are less likely to get caught in it and its high point is lower — it doesn’t reach as much property — so it is less damaging,” Angermeier said. “It’s safer, but the tradeoff is that it lasts longer because the same amount of water still has to go through the system.”

Mogollón’s new approach to mapping flood-regulation capacities incorporates technological capacity, high spatial resolution across watersheds, and the changes in and importance of such landscape features as cropland, grassland, wetland, forest, and urban development, which vary significantly among watersheds.

“Watersheds provide many benefits, from water itself, to beauty and recreation,” Angermeier said. “The less obvious benefits are the processes that purify water and control flooding. Mogollón’s findings are relevant not only to residents of Virginia and North Carolina and the agencies that invest in flood control, but can also be applied to other areas with similar climate, topography, and land use.”

The more finely tuned mapping approach can help ensure that investments in flood management account for the limitations of landscape features, he said. “For example, flood managers in urban areas might consider implementing more of the flood-control practices that seem to be especially effective, such as storm-water ponds and grassy swales, which can also provide recreation and green space.”

[hr]

Categories
Uncategorized

New hook designs could reduce bycatch & reel in unsustainable fishing

From The Guardian

Within seconds of being hauled onto the Shen Lain Cheng, a 79-foot tuna fishing boat from China, the crew’s most senior member, whose deeply wrinkled face conveys more than his 58 years, is plunging a T-handled spike between the glistening eyes of a 100-lb yellowfin tuna. The hope is that the swift death has minimized the release of lactic acid, which degrades the flesh meat and reduces the crew’s chances of earning a grade-A for this fish once it is offloaded back at port in Koror, Palau, a small island nation in the Pacific Ocean.

He quickly eviscerates the taut, silvery fish, pulling out an assembly of organs that look like something from another planet. He removes the heart and stomach – the scavenged parts that will likely go into tonight’s crew dinner – and tosses the rest of the guts overboard before flushing the carcass with running water, sewing up its gaping mouth, and placing it into the icy waters of the boat’s cold storage tank.

If the buyers back in Koror, who inspect and score the quality of each tuna’s meat, give it a high grade, this particular tuna could net around $2,800 wholesale in Japan, where it will be resold at great profit in a sushi restaurant.

It all looks like a typical day of tuna wrangling on the high seas, except that it’s not. Aboard are Lotus Vermeer, who manages the Pacific tuna program for The Nature Conservancy (TNC), a US-based environmental organization. Also aboard are Michael Musyl, principal scientist of the Pelagic Research Group in Hawaii and a shark expert, and Ivan Sesebo, a tuna fishery observer, who works for an auditor hired by the boat’s owner, Hong Kong-based Luen Thai Fishing Ventures, to ensure compliance with fishing regulations.

This trio is executing an experiment, funded by TNC’s Indo-Pacific Tuna Program, to test whether changing the designs of the hooks and other fishing practices could reduce the amount of bycatch – species that are unintentionally caught and often include sharks, turtles, reef fish and other threatened or endangered species – without also reducing the tuna catch, thereby keeping the business financially lucrative for fishing companies.

While many US fisheries have enacted rules meant to limit bycatch, what happens in Palau and other rich fishing grounds has a close connection to the diet of many Americans, because the US imports nearly 90% of seafood consumed.

A radical approach

Bycatch takes a financial toll on fishermen. Unwanted fish take up hooks on lines and require crew to spend time hauling and safely releasing the catch. Some fishermen keep bycatch illegally, cutting off fins to sell on the lucrative black market for shark fin soup. Some bycatch doesn’t survive, and its absence could upset the balance of a marine ecosystem already under threat from climate change and pollution.

However, asking commercial fishermen to experiment with new equipment, which may prove ineffective and costly, requires strong incentives.

TNC got creative to get itself onto an actual tuna boat, bopping along five degrees north of the equator and 133 degrees east of the prime meridian, in waters that the Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission (WCPFC) estimates generates 60% of the world’s tuna catch that amounts to a $7bn annual market.

Working with Palau’s government, TNC purchased the fishing rights and offered them to Shen Lain Cheng in return for an opportunity to carry out Vermeer’s experiment. They also tag sharks and other bycatch to track their movement after being released to see if they survive.

However, asking commercial fishermen to experiment with new equipment, which may prove ineffective and costly, requires strong incentives.

TNC got creative to get itself onto an actual tuna boat, bopping along five degrees north of the equator and 133 degrees east of the prime meridian, in waters that the Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission (WCPFC) estimates generates 60% of the world’s tuna catch that amounts to a $7bn annual market.

Working with Palau’s government, TNC purchased the fishing rights and offered them to Shen Lain Cheng in return for an opportunity to carry out Vermeer’s experiment. They also tag sharks and other bycatch to track their movement after being released to see if they survive.

Hooked on an idea

Studies have shown that switching from the traditional J-shaped hook to a circular hook, or using fish bait instead of squid bait, can reduce the likelihood of catching non-target species on tuna boats.

“Turtles tend to get hooked less often when the bait is a fish, which falls apart as they gum it, whereas with squid they have to chomp the whole thing,” Vermeer explains. “And if it does get hooked, the types of hooks we’re using, called circle hooks, tend to hook in the mouth, whereas an older type of hooks called J-hooks tend to hook turtles deeper, in the esophagus, which is associated with higher mortality.”

Research has so far failed to reveal a silver bullet combination that can minimize bycatch for any species. Until now, there have not been any trials designed to tease out the optimal type of hook and bait that would reduce bycatch of the most vulnerable species without also reducing a boat’s tuna haul for a specific fishery in a specific part of the ocean.

Luen Thai, like many boats fishing for sushi-grade tuna, uses the longline fishing technique, in which thousands of baited hooks are attached to a single, long line stretching up to 25 miles. The setup generates a significant amount of bycatch, though determining exactly how much is difficult for many reasons, including poor, incomplete or inaccurate reporting by many fisheries.

Still, data collected by the United Nations Fisheries and Agriculture Department indicates that tuna longlining produces an amount of bycatch second only to shrimp trawling, while another fishing technique called purse seining – in which schools of small tuna species (mostly for canning) are scooped up in massive nets – generates far less bycatch than longlining. A recent study in the science journal Aquatic Conservation found that bycatch from tuna longline fishing in Palau accounts for a third of all hooked species, so the potential for improvement in this fishery is significant.

Using circle hooks has also shown to reduce incidental hooking of stingrays. Other research has revealed that circle hooks and fish bait can actually lead to hooking more sharks. The truth is more complicated and nuanced, explains Eric Gilman, a professor at Hawaii Pacific University and a fishing industry consultant commissioned by TNC to help design the study on the circle hooks. Sharks migrate, so they reach certain age and size in different parts of the ocean, and those changes could make them more susceptible to being caught by circular hooks of particular sizes.

From there, scientists will be able to study data showing the ages and migration patterns of sharks in different pockets of the western and central Pacific and determine which hook sizes are best to use (and those to avoid) throughout the year. For the bait experiment, the hook variability will be removed, and the type of bait will be alternated between squid and fish to examine the link between bait and bycatch.

Read the full story at The Guardian