Categories
Accolades Climate Change Faculty Spotlight Grants News Research

Three teams awarded GCC seed grants in fall 2021

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_separator style=”dotted”][vc_column_text]

August 27, 2021

Each year, the Global Change Center (GCC), along with the Institute for Society, Creativity and the Environment (ISCE) at Virginia Tech, accept proposals from GCC faculty to support interdisciplinary research that will lead to collaborative proposals submitted to extramural funding sources. We seek projects that link multiple faculty programs and take advantage of unique combinations of expertise at VT, have societal implications and/or a policy component, deal with emerging global change issues that have regional significance, and have high potential to eventually leverage external resources.

Congratulations to the teams awarded GCC seed grants this fall![/vc_column_text][vc_separator style=”dotted”][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column width=”1/4″][vc_single_image image=”57268″ img_size=”large” alignment=”center” style=”vc_box_shadow_border_circle_2″][/vc_column][vc_column width=”3/4″][vc_column_text]

Coupling Social Science and Watershed Modeling to Improve Ecological Health of Streams in Agricultural Landscapes

INVESTIGATORS:

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_separator style=”dotted”][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column width=”1/4″][vc_single_image image=”57484″ img_size=”large” alignment=”center” style=”vc_box_shadow_border_circle_2″][/vc_column][vc_column width=”3/4″][vc_column_text]

Assessing the Potential of Bat Guano Accumulations as Ecosystem Archives in VA

INVESTIGATORS:

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_separator style=”dotted”][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column width=”1/4″][vc_single_image image=”57486″ img_size=”large” alignment=”center” style=”vc_box_shadow_border_circle_2″][/vc_column][vc_column width=”3/4″][vc_column_text]

Predictability of Virginia’s Coastal Aquifer Response to Sea-level Rise and Water Consumption for Hazard Assessment 

INVESTIGATORS:

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_separator style=”shadow”][/vc_column][/vc_row]

Categories
Climate Change News Research

Confronting ecological change takes a collaborative leap with the NEON Ecological Forecasting Challenge

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]

VT News | December 1, 2020

[/vc_column_text][vc_column_text]

Header image:  Abby Road, a terrestrial NEON field site located approximately 18 miles northeast of Vancouver, Washington, and situated in the western foothills of the Cascade Range in the Yacolt Burn State Forest. The site is unique in that it is a dynamically managed forest landscape. Photo courtesy of National Ecological Observatory Network.

Looking to predict beetle abundance and springtime greenness, among other things, the NEON Ecological Forecasting Challenge is looking to mobilize researchers and forecast answers to a complex set of ecological questions.

The National Ecological Observatory Network, otherwise known as NEON, is a continental-scale network of 81 monitoring sites that collects open access ecological data to better understand how ecosystems across the U.S. are changing over time.

“It’s the first of its kind,” said Quinn Thomas, director of the Challenge and associate professor in the Department of Forest Resources and Environmental Conservation in the College of Natural Resources and Environment at Virginia Tech. “Running models to predict ecological data that has yet to be collected across the U.S. is really novel, and doing it across many different fields of ecology simultaneously has never been done before.

”Designed and hosted by 200 contributors within the National Science Foundation-funded Ecological Forecasting Initiative Research Coordination Network (EFI-RCN), the trans-institutional Challenge will launch in 2021 and use data from NEON sites. The Challenge will provide resources and a common framework for generating and submitting forecasts of ecological processes.

“Fundamentally, it’s a means to an end: to advance our capacity to predict the future of nature while generating forecasts that are usable to stakeholders. From a community standpoint, the Challenge is a focal point for sharing knowledge and building a network of scientists and stakeholders engaged in the practice of ecological forecasting,” said Thomas, who is also an affiliated faculty member of the Global Change Center within the Fralin Life Sciences Institute.

The Challenge highlights five different themes: aquatic ecosystems, terrestrial carbon exchange, tick populations, plant phenology, and beetle communities. Each theme involves a different aspect of ecology meant to engage a wide array of researchers.

Since ecological forecasting is a relatively young field, the hope is that the Challenge will build a foundation for ecological forecasting and unravel the uncertainty stakeholders face when managing natural systems.Institutional stakeholders, such as the National Phenology Network and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, are partnering with the EFI-RCN to refine forecasts during the challenge and reduce uncertainty.

“The ‘if you build it, they will come’ mentality doesn’t work for most decision support,” said Michael Dietze, associate professor in the Department of Earth and Environment at Boston University and lead of the affiliated Ecological Forecasting Initiative. “You have to have the decision-makers involved, and you have to really understand what their needs are.”

A major goal of the Challenge is to foster an atmosphere of community. Participants, no matter their forecasting experience, will have the opportunity to collectively share their forecasts, therefore improving future forecasting models.

“One of the fundamental goals in EFI is to bring the community together and understand what are the cross-cutting challenges that we face regardless of what particular system we work in,” Dietze said. “I think the forecast challenge is a rallying cry for the community to come together behind this effort.”

One of the challenges that the ecological forecasting community faces, Dietze said, is education and training. Thomas, at Virginia Tech, will teach an ecological forecasting course in the spring, as will Dietze at Boston University and Carl Boettiger at UC Berkeley. Undergraduate and graduate students in these courses will be directly participating in the NEON Ecological Forecasting Challenge.

“We hope that it can pull in a new generation of scientists who think about the aspects of ecological forecasting early in their career training,” Thomas said. “Not only does that include producing forecasts, but that’s learning how to do ecology in the context of computational sciences and reproducibility.”

To galvanize these early-career scientists, graduate and postdoctoral students are also going beyond the classroom and leading Challenge themes.“This grassroots effort that the Ecological Forecasting Initiative is bringing on is really awesome, and beyond that, it’s an honor to be a part of it,” said Anna Spiers, a Ph.D. student at the University of Colorado and team leader for the beetle community theme. “I’m really excited to see the range of participants who come to the challenge and the range of models that people create.”

The EFI-RCN encourages students, both undergraduate and graduate, to join the challenge alongside faculty, institutional researchers, and international groups. Participants can submit forecasts as individuals or teams and will be evaluated based on their forecasts’ precision and accuracy. Evaluations and data will be available in real-time through an automated cyberinfrastructure.

Being the Challenge’s inaugural year, Thomas understands this year will look to increase participant numbers and smooth over any wrinkles in anticipation of running the Challenge in future years. Regardless, this year’s challenge is the first step for the EFI-RCN and the ecological community at large to better predict and understand the vital forces of nature.

To register for the EFI-RCN NEON Ecological Forecasting Challenge, visit the challenge’s website.

– Written by Tyler Harris

[/vc_column_text][vc_separator][vc_column_text]

Related Stories:

 

[hr]

CONTACT:

Kristin Rose Jutras

(540) 231-6614

[/vc_column_text][vc_separator style=”shadow”][/vc_column][/vc_row]

Categories
Climate Change Faculty Spotlight Research Water

Warmer mountaintops, wetter coasts

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]

VT News | November 20, 2020

[/vc_column_text][vc_column_text]

At the edge of a retreating glacier, bedrock terrain that has been hidden under layers of ice is seeing light for the first time in several hundred years. On mountain peaks, trees experiencing warmer weather are gradually moving higher than established tree lines. Along Virginia’s coast, sea levels are rising by as much as 1 inch every four years.

These seemingly small changes to our landscapes are the frontiers where two faculty members in the College of Natural Resources and Environment’s Department of Geography are investigating how climate change will impact both the natural world and the communities where we live.

Climate challenges to coastal living

On our coasts, new lines of inquiry are also being fueled by and necessitated by climate change.

As sea levels rise and storms become more frequent and severe, there is an urgent need to understand community-scale responses to accelerating coastal risks. In Virginia, Assistant Professor and Global Change Center affiliate Anamaria Bukvic works with stakeholders to capture their experiences with coastal flooding and the ways they are coping with it, to better inform adaptation and resilience policies and programs.

“We are currently exploring the role of sense-of-place in a household’s decision to stay or move from a coastal community in response to flooding,” explained Bukvic, who teaches a course on the societal impacts of climate change. “We’re also investigating potential tipping points or cascading events on a community and household level that may lead to permanent relocation from flood-affected coastal locations.”

As a human geographer, Bukvic studies interactions between people and places using mixed methods, such as geospatial analysis, interviews, and surveys. She notes that the coronavirus pandemic has presented an obstacle in her efforts to interact with stakeholders.

“A significant portion of my work is done in person with communities and people,” she said. “When we learned this past spring that we could no longer collect data in person, we had to quickly adapt and move all of our primary data collection efforts to different modalities, like mail and online surveys and interviews via Zoom. The silver lining is that COVID-19 has inspired us to innovate and develop new and complementing ways to conduct our research.”

Bukvic further studies the impacts of recurrent or nuisance flooding on households’ decisions to consider relocation.

“While a majority of our respondents state it will take a big disaster like Katrina or Sandy to drive them away, smaller but frequent flood events can also serve as stressors that will gradually push people out of their communities,” she explained. “Even inconveniences like school delays and closures, longer commutes to work, and flooded parking lots can have a significant impact on people’s willingness to relocate.”

Bukvic, a Fellow with the National Center for Atmospheric Research’s Early Career Faculty Innovator Program and associate director of Virginia Tech’s Center for Coastal Studies housed in the Fralin Life Sciences Institute, notes that there are paralleling coastal challenges and responses to climate change threats across the world.

“We conducted a systematic literature review to identify which factors define sense-of-place in the context of natural hazards, disasters, and population mobility,” she said. “Based on our analysis, we developed a new measure of sense-of-place and applied it to rural and urban coastal case study locations in the U.S. and found that some considerations are remarkably similar across the globe. For example, people in rural areas generally have stronger attachments to their community due to greater social cohesion, connections to the land and natural environment, and their cultural identity.”

[/vc_column_text][vc_column_text]

Understanding emerging mountain ecosystems

Professor Lynn Resler researches high elevation ecosystems in North America, studying the dynamics that contribute to alpine tree line vegetation change. An ecological biogeographer, Resler examines current ecological processes taking place in remote locations.

“A lot of my work is predictive: I’m looking at what is happening right now and using that to understand what will happen in the future,” she said. “Understanding pattern-process relationships is key to figuring out how these ecosystems are going to be impacted by climate change.”

Resler, who has nearly 20 years of field experience working above the tree line in the Rocky Mountains as well as high elevation peaks in the Appalachian Mountains, has shown that vegetation characteristics in alpine environments are informed by a complex interplay between terrain topography and interactions taking place between plants and pathogens.

One example can be found in whitebark pine forests in the Rockies, where Resler and her collaborators provided crucial research on the spread of white pine blister rust, caused by an invasive fungal pathogen that moves from gooseberry or currant plants to white pines. While other studies suggested that high-altitude pines in cold, dry climates wouldn’t be affected by the fungus, Resler was able to document the spread of the blight above the tree line.

“Our findings led to a rich trajectory of research,” she noted. “Demonstrating that damage and mortality caused by blister rust inhibits the migration of whitepark pine means that we will see a change in the spatial pattern and function of tree lines throughout the Rockies.”

More recently, Resler, who teaches courses in biogeography and mountain geography, has been researching ecosystems that develop as land becomes exposed in the wake of glacier melt in Montana’s Glacier National Park.

“There is a great deal of research on the retreating of glaciers, but not as much on what is happening on the terrain that is exposed by that retreat,” she explained. “I’m looking at vegetation colonization processes at the forefront of glaciers.”

Resler noted that colonization of that new land is a slow process and one that is informed significantly by what kinds of rock exist underneath the ice.

“Geomorphic processes are an important bottleneck in plant succession in these places,” she said. “Plant colonization is very much tied to the nature of the underlying bedrock and glacial geomorphic processes that break down bedrock.”

Resler noted that on both mountaintop tree lines and glacier edges, climate models, while important, cannot alone predict what developing ecosystems will look like because many factors contribute to species range dynamics, including plant interactions, landscape processes, and invasive species.

“I think there’s an expectation that as glaciers retreat, the ecosystems that develop on newly exposed terrain will be the same as those that currently exist in the surrounding environments. But under changing climate scenarios, there are opportunities for new kinds of plants to colonize. The lags in colonization of surrounding plants are leaving space for invasive species to take hold and may alter the landscape significantly.”

Thinking broadly to meet a complex challenge

Both Bukvic and Resler recognize that the Department of Geography has a crucial role to play in bettering our understanding of the impacts of climate change in both the natural world and the human one.

“One of the advantages of the department is that it is highly interdisciplinary,” Bukvic explained. “We have the necessary skills and expertise to tackle emerging, complex issues, such as climate change and coastal resilience, across various physical and human dimensions.”

“Our students are increasingly aware of emerging climate change issues and are interested in finding solutions for some of the pressing challenges that are already affecting natural, built, and human coastal systems,” she continued. “We have a unique opportunity to shape a new workforce of geographers who are equipped with skills and knowledge to engage in a dialogue on coastal resilience and to actively influence the future of our coasts.”

Resler, who has led undergraduate and graduate students on research trips to Washington’s Cascade Mountains as well as study abroad experiences in Antarctica and New Zealand, notes that cultivating a sophisticated understanding of how various areas of research are interconnected is crucial for understanding climate change.

“I love to help students see the big picture, and field experiences are one of the best ways to achieve this goal,” she said. “I think it’s important to help them navigate broad-concept critical thinking while providing them with hands-on, course-relevant information.”

– Written by David Fleming

[/vc_column_text][vc_separator][vc_column_text]

CONTACT:
Krista Timney
(540) 231-6157

[/vc_column_text][vc_separator style=”shadow”][/vc_column][/vc_row]

Categories
Accolades Climate Change Faculty Spotlight Grants News Research

Five teams awarded GCC seed grants in fall 2020

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_separator style=”dotted”][vc_column_text]

November 20, 2020

Each year, the Global Change Center (GCC) solicits proposals from GCC faculty to support interdisciplinary research that will lead to collaborative proposals submitted to extramural funding sources. Selected projects link multiple faculty programs and take advantage of unique combinations of expertise at VT, have societal implications and/or a policy component, deal with emerging global change issues that have regional significance, and have high potential to eventually leverage external resources.

The fall 2020 application cycle saw the highest number of proposals submitted to date, resulting in five teams awarded a cumulative total of $108K in seed grant funding from the Global Change Center, with support from the Fralin Life Sciences Institute.

Congratulations GCC faculty and collaborators![/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column width=”1/4″][vc_single_image image=”52887″ img_size=”large” alignment=”center” style=”vc_box_shadow_border_circle_2″][/vc_column][vc_column width=”3/4″][vc_column_text]

Taking the Pulse of Global Shark Populations

INVESTIGATORS:

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_separator style=”dotted”][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column width=”1/4″][vc_single_image image=”52907″ img_size=”large” alignment=”center” style=”vc_box_shadow_border_circle_2″][/vc_column][vc_column width=”3/4″][vc_column_text]

Salty carbon: Testing the consequences of freshwater salinization on stream food web dynamics and ecosystem metabolism

INVESTIGATORS:

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_separator style=”dotted”][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column width=”1/4″][vc_single_image image=”52929″ img_size=”large” alignment=”center” style=”vc_box_shadow_border_circle_2″][/vc_column][vc_column width=”3/4″][vc_column_text]

Using a global weed to disentangle environment and host effects on plant-microbe interactions across nested spatial scales 

INVESTIGATORS:

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_separator style=”dotted”][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column width=”1/4″][vc_single_image image=”52945″ img_size=”large” alignment=”center” style=”vc_box_shadow_border_circle_2″][/vc_column][vc_column width=”3/4″][vc_column_text]

Do altered soil moisture patterns restructure soil microbial communities and their contributions to greenhouse gas emissions?

INVESTIGATORS:
  • Dr. Brian Strahm, Forest Resources and Environmental Conservation
  • Dr. Brian Badgley, School of Plant and Environmental Sciences
  • Dr. Durelle Scott, Biological Systems Engineering
  • Dr. Angela Possinger, Forest Resources and Environmental Conservation

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_separator style=”dotted”][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column width=”1/4″][vc_single_image image=”52917″ img_size=”large” alignment=”center” style=”vc_box_shadow_border_circle_2″][/vc_column][vc_column width=”3/4″][vc_column_text]

Developing a predictive model for in-stream embeddedness to link physical processes with biotic responses

INVESTIGATORS:

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_separator style=”shadow”][/vc_column][/vc_row]

Categories
Climate Change Interfaces of Global Change IGEP News Research Water

Study: Land development and climate change threaten clear water lakes, but there is hope for protecting them

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]

VT News | October 14, 2020

[/vc_column_text][vc_column_text]

Scientists have long known that clear water lakes are in danger from land development, pollutants, run-off from storms, and climate change because of increased nutrient pollutants that lead to algae blooms.

However, a recent study from the Virginia Tech Department of Biological Sciences shows that the negative effects from climate change can be mitigated by limiting nutrient pollution from land development in clear-water lakes.

Algae, of course, are a critical part of lake food webs and the zooplankton that eat them. But too much algae in lakes can cause scums on the water, blocking out sunlight for other life in the lake. When the algae die and decompose, they release more nutrients, which can cause even more algae blooms.

“High nutrient pollution can come from many sources: fertilizers and sewage waste are some of the worst sources of nutrient pollution, as far as having the highest concentration of nutrients,” said Nicole Ward, Interfaces of Global Change IGEP fellow and a doctoral student in biological sciences, part of the Virginia Tech College of Science, who led the study.

Ward worked on the study – recently published in the journal Water Resources Research – alongside mentor Cayelan Carey, an associate professor of biological sciences, Kathleen Weathers, a scientist at the Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies, in addition to collaborators at Dartmouth College in New Hampshire, Bates College in Maine, and the University of Wisconsin-Madison.

The nutrients Ward and Carey refer to are nitrogen and phosphorus – essential building blocks for life, found in DNA, cells, bones, and energy sources. In freshwater systems, the number of organisms living in the water is dependent on the availability of nitrogen and phosphorus. That’s a double-edged sword.

[/vc_column_text][vc_single_image image=”52241″ img_size=”700×400″ add_caption=”yes” alignment=”center”][vc_column_text]

“Erosion and landslides also transport nutrients. Phosphorus is generally bound to sediment particles, so as sediment enters the water it is bringing phosphorus with it,” Ward said. “So, when we add more nutrients, we can really quickly see a lot more life – which seems like a good thing, right? But too much of a good thing is notgood. So, we get huge algae blooms with high nutrient pollution, this can cause scums on the water, potentially harming plants and fish.”

And there’s another issue: “When the algae inevitably die, their decomposition uses up the oxygen in the water, killing organisms in the water that need oxygen,” Ward added.

Further, Ward and Carey found that the negative effects of land use and climate change on a lake depend on if yearly maximum or average phytoplankton concentrations are studied. Average phytoplankton concentrations, during typical summer conditions, show an increase with either warmer air temperatures or higher nutrient pollution. However, annual maximum phytoplankton concentration – or blooms – only increase with higher nutrient pollution.

In the study, Ward and Carey wrote, “Typical summer phytoplankton concentrations will likely increase with warmer air temperatures due to climate change alone and increase even further when combined with higher nutrient pollution. To maintain clear water lakes, nutrient pollution should be reduced even more than previously thought to compensate for increasing phytoplankton in a warmer climate.”

“Oligotrophic lakes – low-nutrient, clear-water lakes with high transparency – are disappearing due to human activities,” said Carey, an affiliated member of Virginia Tech’s Fralin Life Sciences Institute and the Global Change Center. Most of our understanding about how lakes function is from lakes that have already been degraded, so our goal in this study is to understand what factors affect their water quality to best protect them.”

The study focused on Lake Sunapee in New Hampshire, located near Carey’s alma mater, Dartmouth. It was chosen for its pristine water quality and rural location.

The lake also has a goldmine of data thanks to the hard work of the nonprofit, community-operated Lake Sunapee Protective Association. It has 31 years of water quality data, including statistics from a high-frequency buoy monitor that has collected data at 15-minute intervals since 2007. Ward called the group and its data set “critical” to the study.

Ward simulated conditions under five scenarios using the 31-year period data sets. “This study was all data analytics and modeling,” Ward said. “Modeling enables ‘experimentation’ on ecosystems that are not possible in the real world and overcomes logistical limitations of an experiment as large as a watershed. For example, just consider the time to experimentally test each scenario I did in model space: it would have taken 186 years. Our computational abilities, advances in modeling, and advances in sensor technology is completely changing the way we do environmental science.”

Ward added, “Even though this huge global issue of climate change is happening, and we know it is changing water quality across the globe from other research, we can have hope of saving our clear-water lakes from large changes in water quality if we focus on local nutrient pollution. By limiting nutrient availability in the water, the negative climate effects have less ability to wreak havoc.”

The study was funded by a grant from the National Science Foundation’s Coupled Human Natural Systems program. It was part of a larger project to look at several lakes and their water quality under the banner of the project CNH-Lakes, or the Coupled Natural and Human Systems Project, spearheaded by Carey and fellow Virginia Tech faculty Kelly Cobourn, an associate professor in the Department of Forest Resources and Environmental Conversation, part of the College of Natural Resources and Environment, and Kevin Boyle, a professor in the Department of Agriculture and Applied Economics in the College of Agriculture and Life Sciences.

Related stories

To ensure safe drinking water, experts forecast the health of lakes and reservoirs

Study explores connections between land management, water quality, and human response in lake catchments

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]

[hr]

CONTACTS:

Steven Mackay

540-231-5035

[hr_shadow]

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_separator style=”shadow”][/vc_column][/vc_row]

Categories
Announcements Climate Change Conservation Ideas

New Restoration Ecology Group welcomes participants

August 26, 2020

Friends and affiliates of the GCC are invited to join a new Restoration Ecology Working Group forming this semester. The group will meet virtually every other week, starting the week of September 7, and is open to anyone interested in collaborating on interdisciplinary projects related to restoration ecology. We will spend the Fall term reading literature, establishing rapport, and identifying targets for future work together. Our open-ended list of focal topics currently includes:
  • What to expect from the UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration (2021-2030)
  • Community participation in ecological restoration projects
  • COVID impacts on ecological restoration
  • Ecological restoration as a public health intervention
  • Creating more dynamic reference models for Virginia restoration
For more information, contact Leighton Reid (jlreid@vt.edu) or Karen Kovaka (kkovaka@vt.edu).
Or, simply fill out the poll to indicate your availability to meet: https://www.when2meet.com/?9609466-25xqn.
Check out Leighton Reid’s blog on restoration ecology while you’re at it!
Categories
Blog Climate Change

In a virtual environment, collaboration and engagement remain at the heart of Climate Action Commitment revision process

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]

From VT News  |  May 21, 2020

The ongoing Climate Action Commitment revision process is not only generating recommendations that will help guide Virginia Tech’s sustainable future, it is also fostering a dynamic ecosystem of university and community members collaborating to collectively tackle this important challenge.

This network of nearly 125 students, faculty, and staff from across operations, academics, and research, and community representatives continues to be highly engaged in moving the revision process forward – in a fully virtual environment.

Approved initially in 2009 by the Virginia Tech Board of Visitors, the Virginia Tech Climate Action Commitment serves as the university’s guiding framework around sustainability and energy efficiency in campus operations, facilities, curriculum, and research. In late 2019, President Tim Sands called for its renewal and revision to ensure the most stringent climate and sustainability standards are implemented as Virginia Tech continues to grow and seeks to be a leader in environmental stewardship.

Despite the shift to a remote campus setting due to COVID-19, the working group leading the update process is on track to deliver final revision recommendations to Senior Vice President and Chief Business Officer Dwayne Pinkney within the next month.

Requiring exceptional collaboration, community input, and knowledge transfer under a tight timeframe, when it comes to the revision process and delivering recommendations, what has been the recipe for success?

“The same ingredients that underscore effective in-person group interactions are essential in virtual environments,” said Todd Schenk, assistant professor of urban affairs and planning within the College of Architecture and Urban Studies and vice chair of the Climate Action Commitment revision working group.

“One key ingredient is the need for a shared commitment among participants. In the example of the Climate Action Commitment revisions, all participants are passionate about a more sustainable Virginia Tech. That does not, however, mean we agree on everything. A second key ingredient is that we are dedicated to constructive deliberations and are respectful of each other’s unique vantage points and expertise. We all also agree that accountability is essential to stay on track.”

Strong coordination has also been critical in the process, especially in delivering opportunities for the greater university, local community, and alumni to get involved and share their voices in the revision efforts.

With 12 subcommittees meeting weekly to formulate recommendations, organization, and communication among the working group and subcommittees has been vital.

Coordination has been central to the efforts of the Community Engagement Subcommittee in particular. When plans for a large scale in-person campus convening had to be adapted in light of the governor’s stay at home order, subcommittee members sprang into action to organize a series of 12 Zoom convenings.

The sessions, attended by nearly 200 stakeholders from the university, alumni, and regional communities, and beyond, offered attendees the opportunity to get up-to-date on revision efforts and the chance to share their thoughts on a variety of sustainability topics through well-coordinated Zoom breakout rooms.

“Being an active member of my community is part of life’s purpose. I am proud to call Blacksburg home and of the many years I spent at Virginia Tech. The unique opportunity to participate in the Climate Action Commitment revision efforts and the Zoom convenings to help implement sustainable change is rewarding. As a community member and alumna, it is also gratifying to be able to share my knowledge and experiences from farming, teaching, and being a mother and veterinarian,” shared Sarah Haring, who earned both a Doctor of Veterinary Medicine in 2016 and a Master of Public Health in 2020 from the Virginia-Maryland College of Veterinary Medicine.

An unwavering commitment to the cause, collaboration, and coordination will be essential continuing to move Virginia Tech’s environmental stewardship efforts forward once the renewed Climate Action Commitment is live. One of the last tasks of the current Community Engagement Subcommittee is to recommend how to keep these important conversations going.

“It has been incredible to engage with so many stakeholders from a range of disciplines and work toward a common goal. Even during the pandemic, our Community Engagement Subcommittee has stayed in almost daily communication,” said Heidi Hahn, a rising junior majoring in environmental policy and planning within the College of Architecture and Urban Studies and minoring in green engineering within the College of Engineering.

Click here to learn more about the Climate Action Commitment revision process. The latest updates will also be shared via VT News.


Related links:

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_separator style=”shadow”][/vc_column][/vc_row]

Categories
Climate Change Outreach Science Communication Seminars, Workshops, Lectures Special Events

For Earth Week, GCC faculty take part in digital “teach in”

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]April 24, 2020

Virginia Tech for Climate Justice, a student-led organization with faculty supporters, had plans for an engaging week of activities for Earth Week, but due to concerns over the novel coronavirus, they shifted their focus to many digital events!

A Climate Justice Teach-In (originally scheduled for March 18th) transformed into a variety of educational videos created by experts to explain the science behind climate issues how they affect humans. GCC affiliate Carl Zipper presented a talk on the “Human Influence on Climate Change.” Luis Escobar‘s presentation was on “Climate Change and Health.”

Check out their videos (and more) by visiting VT’s Climate Justice Facebook videos page![/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_video link=”https://www.facebook.com/VTforClimateJustice/videos/537578806898129/”][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][/vc_column][/vc_row]

Categories
Blog Climate Change Conservation Drinking water Educational Outreach Global Change Research Water

Virginia Water Center recognized as a national leader in water education and outreach

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]From VT News | February 24, 2020

For the first time, the Virginia Water Resources Research Center, housed at Virginia Tech, received a status of “outstanding” from the U.S. Department of the Interior. Virginia’s Water Center was one of 12 such centers in the nation to receive this designation.

“The water center operates as something of a clearinghouse and a focal point for water education, outreach, and research at Virginia Tech,” explained Professor Stephen Schoenholtz, director of the Virginia Water Center and a faculty member in the Department of Forest Resources and Environmental Conservation. “We’re an independent, nonsiloed place to foster and promote research on water issues across a wide range of areas.”

The Virginia Water Resources Research Center traces its origins to the federal Water Resources Research Act of 1964, which sought to establish research centers on matters related to water supply, water quality protection, and water resource management in all 50 states as well as the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands, and Guam. Virginia Tech was selected to house the commonwealth’s center in 1965. The Virginia Water Resources Research Center was written into the Code of Virginia by the General Assembly in 1982 and is currently housed within Virginia Tech’s College of Natural Resources and Environment.

U.S. water centers and institutes that are part of the 1964 act receive funding in five-year cycles, and their output is evaluated by an independent panel of scientists from the U.S. Geological Survey. The most recent review, for the years 2011 through 2015, credited the program as having done an exemplary job of communicating water news and information to the broader public. The Virginia Water Resources Research Center was further praised for its focus on research aimed at solving state water issues.

“Engagement and outreach have been a big focus for our center over the last decade,” Schoenholtz said. “We aim to provide unbiased information for water resource management decisions that are being made at the state, regional, and national level.”

Among the center’s outreach efforts is a database of breaking water news stories, water-related legislation decisions and documents, and links to information about water-related subjects pertaining to the state. The center produces Virginia Water Radio, a weekly program focusing on a specific water issue or topic of interest in Virginia. The broadcasts are tied to the Virginia Standards of Learning and can be used in K-12 classrooms throughout the state.

The center provides seed grants for undergraduate and graduate students studying water resources and funds an internship program for undergraduate students at Virginia Tech. This spring, two interns traveled with Schoenholtz to Washington, D.C., to meet with federal policymakers to discuss water issues affecting Virginia. The center also led Virginia Tech in developing a unique undergraduate degree program in water: resources, policy, and management, which takes an interdisciplinary approach to water science, management, and policy.

Looking ahead, Schoenholtz would like to increase student training and expand grant opportunities for undergraduate and graduate students. Discussions are also underway about offering master’s and doctoral degrees in water science.

“Water issues range from very local, affecting individual households, to global scales that affect everyone, and those challenges are only going to increase in the face of climate change and growing population,” Schoenholtz noted. “With the Virginia Water Center, we have a wide range of possibilities to address these challenges while working to keep the public aware of the numerous resources available to them.”

Written by David Fleming

CONTACT:

Krista Timney
540-231-6157

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

Categories
Blog Climate Change Conservation Global Change Research Water

Researchers seek to impact New Zealand water quality by understanding forest-water interactions

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]From VT News | February 7, 2020

Forest systems, a crucial resource for fresh water around the world, are under increasing pressure from global change factors like climate change, population growth, and land management decisions. To meet future demands for clean water, scientists need a clear understanding of the dynamics of water and nutrients in forest systems.

To broaden understanding of those systems, two faculty members in Virginia Tech’s College of Natural Resources and Environment are partnering with the New Zealand government-owned research entity Scion. They are undertaking an ambitious collaborative project that will utilize remote sensing technology, isotopic tracing, and manipulative field studies to develop a comprehensive model of water and nutrient flow through forested watersheds and streams.

“One of the big questions facing New Zealand is how climate change drivers and land use changes are going to affect ecosystem services,” explained Associate Professor Brian Strahm, of the Department of Forest Resources and Environmental Conservation. “There is a lot of uncertainty about what the future will look like. The broad purpose of this grant is to try to reduce some of that uncertainty and give the people of New Zealand confidence in their land use choices going forward.”

The five-year research project, called Forest Flows, will develop forest hydrology models to measure and predict the storage and release of water in forest catchments while simultaneously allowing scientists to collect data on nutrient cycling, with a particular emphasis on the export, utilization, and cycling of nitrogen.

“A major goal is to disentangle the soil and hydrologic processes controlling nutrient cycling and export from forested watersheds,” said Associate Professor Kevin McGuire, also of the Department of Forest Resources and Environmental Conservation and associate director of the Virginia Water Resources Research Center. “You can’t really look at the cycling of nitrogen at the watershed level without understanding how it’s transported and reacts within soil.”

To explore that question, researchers will use isotopic “tracers” in the water and in nitrogen to measure the movement of water and nutrients through a forest system.

“We’ll be using stable isotopes to track the movement of water and nitrogen through these systems,” Strahm said. “It’s a little like putting a flag or a tracker on a molecule of water or an atom of nitrogen and seeing where it goes through the environment.”

This research will build on their recent study published in the journal Water Resources Researchthat modeled hillslope water flow to estimate how natural systems behave in response to land use or climate changes. The research was carried out at the U.S. Forest Service’s Coweeta Hydrological Lab in North Carolina.

“The hillslope study is what got us in the ballgame with Scion,” Strahm said. “Our experimental hillslope is tightly controlled, which allows us to do very specific manipulations of precipitation. We can basically make our own rain or alter nitrogen availability in that system. Scion would like us to build on that kind of work, adjusting those experimental variables so that they are relevant to the future of New Zealand.”

Recognized as a global leader in forest hydrological research in the 1970s and 1980s, New Zealand has experienced a significant land use shift from forestry to cattle and dairy. As a result of that shift, and as climate change threatens more periods of flooding and drought, there is increasing attention on the ways that land management decisions will impact water quality in the future.

“New Zealand wants to understand this challenge at the scale of their nation, so that they can better understand how independent land management decisions will scale up to impact water quality moving ahead,” Strahm said. “They want to be prepared to deal with future climate change drivers and make sure that their land use decisions are compatible with their social and cultural values.”

While the project is focused on the unique challenges of New Zealand forest watersheds, both professors, who are affiliated faculty members of the Global Change Center housed under Virginia Tech’s Fralin Life Sciences Institute, noted that this research has both local and global implications.

“The issues we’re looking at in New Zealand are applicable anywhere,” McGuire said. “Here in Virginia, most of our drinking water originates in forested watersheds. What happens in those forests and how water is used has huge implications for water quality and availability.”

The project’s total grant amount of approximately $9 million (NZ$13,736,775) is funded to Scion by the New Zealand Ministry of Business, Innovation, and Employment. Virginia Tech’s subcontract from Scion will include support for a student researcher to participate in the project.

-Written by David Fleming

 

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]