Categories
Advocacy Blog Educational Outreach Environmental Justice Global Change IGC Interfaces of Global Change IGEP Outreach Research Student Spotlight

IGC Fellows engage in science policy action through the Virginia-Science Community Interface coalition

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_empty_space][/vc_column][vc_column][vc_single_image image=”56857″ img_size=”full” alignment=”center” style=”vc_box_shadow_3d”][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]

August 3, 2021

[/vc_column_text][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner][vc_column_text]

As conservationist Rachel Carson once said, “The human race is challenged more than ever before to demonstrate our mastery, not over nature, but of ourselves.”  This sentiment is even more important today in a world that is facing a climate crisis. Through the interdisciplinary graduate education program of the Global Change Center (GCC), Interfaces of Global Change (IGC) Fellows are trained to uphold the GCC mission: to advance interdisciplinary scholarship and education to address critical global changes impacting the environment and society. The program empowers students with tools to be successful in collaborative research and to engage the wider community as part of the solution to global environmental challenges. One way in which Fellows have fulfilled this mission is through the creation and development of the Virginia-Science Community Interface coalition.

Started in 2019, The Virginia Scientist-Community Interface (V-SCI) is a coalition of scientists and engineers who are dedicated to getting science into the hands of community members. The inception of V-SCI was based on the fact that, while community-driven advocacy and activism can often be backed up by science, this expertise is not always available for local issues. Thus their mission is to provide scientific expertise for community-driven activism and advocacy in Virginia and the region as an independent and volunteer-led organization. The work often involves cross-checking industry and government documents with scientific literature across multiple disciplines.

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column_inner][/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner][vc_separator style=”shadow”][vc_column_text]

We work at the interface between scientists and nonprofit, grassroots, and community leaders to provide expertise for local and regional advocacy issues.

[/vc_column_text][vc_separator style=”shadow”][/vc_column_inner][/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1/2″][vc_single_image image=”56811″ img_size=”full” add_caption=”yes” alignment=”center” style=”vc_box_border”][/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1/2″][vc_single_image image=”56812″ img_size=”full” add_caption=”yes” alignment=”center” style=”vc_box_border”][/vc_column_inner][/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner][vc_column_text]

A number of IGC Fellows have co-authored reports, led projects, and given presentations as part of the coalition, including Isaac VanDiest, Daniel Smith, Joshua Rady, Kerry Gendreau, Alaina Weinheimer, and Tyler Weiglein. Together, they aim to empower communities to advocate for themselves. Reflecting on his experience with V-SCI, Isaac says, My graduate program has taught me about global change in the classroom, and V-SCI has given me the opportunity to put skills to work in a real-world setting.” An added benefit to the coalition is that students from different universities across the Southeast are able to interact and address a diverse set of local and national issues. As Daniel says, V-SCI has allowed me to broaden my knowledge of science and policy, and to immediately apply that knowledge to solve a problem. The consistency of the group meetings has helped me gain confidence in work outside of my direct area of research.”

Fellows recently shared their work through a presentation titled, “V-SCI: Connecting Science with Local Environmental Advocacy,” at the 6th Annual IGC Research Symposium this past spring. Additionally, Isaac, Daniel, Joshua, and Kerry are working to designate V-SCI as an official IGC IGEP capstone project and encourage other Fellows to join.

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column_inner][/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1/2″][vc_single_image image=”56843″ img_size=”full” add_caption=”yes” alignment=”center” style=”vc_box_border”][/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1/2″][vc_single_image image=”56814″ img_size=”full” add_caption=”yes” alignment=”center” style=”vc_box_border”][/vc_column_inner][/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner][vc_column_text]

The coalition has created multiple reports addressing local environmental efforts in the community such as the Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC’s (MVP) proposal, the Eviction Crisis for Seniors in Virginia during the COVID-19 pandemic, and the Impact of the Atlantic Coast Pipeline on at-risk-species. Current projects that are actively recruiting volunteers include addressing industrial pollution in southwest Virginia, exploratory healthcare advocacy work, and protecting the candy darter. 

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column_inner][/vc_row_inner][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner][vc_column_text]

Advancing their mission will require continued efforts from objective scientists who are interested in community advocacy. With over 100 graduate student members from 7 institutions in their growing network, V-SCI provides ample networking, leadership, and research opportunities. Currently, V-SCI is looking to recruit more members for ongoing projects this summer. The coalition welcomes individuals at all levels and from all backgrounds, both personally and professionally. No disciplinary knowledge related to the projects is expected and they are happy to provide mentorship.

The coalition also continually seeks feedback and reviews from senior scientists who support their mission. If you are interested in learning more about their work and how to get involved, V-SCI leaders hold open office hours every Friday at 1pm EST (zoom link here).

For more information, view the V-SCI Student Group Flyer, or contact info@viginiasci.org.  

[/vc_column_text][vc_separator style=”shadow”][/vc_column_inner][/vc_row_inner][/vc_column][/vc_row]

Categories
Blog Drinking water Environmental Justice Faculty Spotlight Global Change Outreach Pollution Water

VT researcher working to provide clean water to Appalachia

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]

From CALS VT News  |  June 20, 2020

More than 2 million Americans live without access to safe drinking water or adequate sewer sanitation, according to a 2019 study by the U.S. Water Alliance. That includes around a quarter-million people in Puerto Rico and half a million homeless people in the United States. The biggest chunk, though — around 1.4 million people — are United States residents who live in homes that don’t have proper plumbing or tap water.

They are clustered in five areas: California’s Central Valley; predominantly Native American communities near the four corners of Utah, Colorado, Arizona, and New Mexico; the Texas-Mexico border; the Mississippi Delta region in Mississippi and Alabama; and central Appalachia. Virginia alone has around 20,000 homes without plumbing.

Leigh-Anne Krometis, an associate professor of biological systems engineering which is in both the College of Agriculture and Life Sciences and College of Engineering at Virginia Tech, is one of the foremost experts on water quality and availability in Appalachia. And while the basics of her work seem, well, basic — “I just spent a decade proving that not having sewers is a bad thing, which we’ve known for literally thousands of years,” she said — the implications are more complex.

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]

Often, the best minds in American civil and environmental engineering are looking abroad, at how to bring clean water to remote villages and slums in developing countries. The crisis over lead in the tap water in Flint, Michigan, was a reminder that all over the United States, people lack access to safe drinking water and adequate sanitation.

In the past three years, Krometis has authored a series of studies of water quality and availability in the Appalachian region. In 2017, she published “Tracking the Downstream Impacts of Inadequate Sanitation in Central Appalachia” in the “Journal of Water and Health.”

That article looked at what happens to streams when homes near them don’t have proper plumbing. Usually, that means a “straight pipe” that carries untreated sewage into an unlined hole in the ground, which drains either directly or indirectly into a stream. Krometis and her team found E. coli bacteria consistent with untreated human waste in those streams, in spots that were correlated with their proximity to homes without proper sewage systems. Sometimes the contamination carried as far as six miles downstream.

 

Image of Leigh-Anne Krometis

Krometis’ newest article on the subject, “Water Scavenging from Roadside Springs in Appalachia,” published in May 2019 in the “Journal of Contemporary Water Research and Education,” connects her earlier research on wastewater to the issue of drinking water. Some untold number of people in Appalachia drink untreated water from springs or streams — often the same streams that are close to straight sewage pipes. Krometis and her team tested the water at 21 springs used for drinking water, and more than 80 percent of them tested positive for E. coli.

Krometis also surveyed people who drink untreated spring water, and found that most of them do have running water in their homes, often from wells. They said they preferred the spring water because it tastes better than their tap water, or because they don’t trust the quality and reliability of the water in their homes.

Fixing these two interrelated problems, of wastewater and drinking water, isn’t easy. The homes that use straight pipes and roadsides springs tend to be far away from the nearest municipal sewer and water systems, and often separated by mountains and ravines. It could cost $50,000 or more to hook one of these homes up to a sewer system, even if there is one nearby, Krometis said. Septic tanks are usually unsuitable because the soil isn’t deep enough.

“These are legitimately challenging engineering problems, and they require a lot of money, and these places don’t have a lot of money,” she said. “We haven’t figured out ways to get water and sewer to extremely rural areas, and there are also huge issues with the homeless and the working poor in urban areas.”

There are cheaper and easier solutions, of the type used in developing countries. Public water kiosks for drinking water are one, and are already in use in some parts of Kentucky and West Virginia; small water or sewer treatment devices installed for each home or cluster of homes are another option. Krometis supports these tactics, though she sees the political and cultural obstacles to using them in the United States.

“The technologies that are best practices in Africa or Southeast Asia, we don’t use in the United States. They’re unacceptable because we’re a developed country,” she said. “But in my mind, if you have somebody who’s impoverished and doesn’t have access to clean water, that’s a problem that we need to address.”

People are hesitant to give residents of Appalachian mountain hollows or California’s dry and dusty farm town water and sewer systems that aren’t up to the standards of their fellow Americans in cities and suburbs. Krometis understands that hesitation, but she also understands that many of those poor Americans are going without any access to reliable, clean water.

“I see both sides of the coin,” she said. “The problem is, we’re not even having that debate.”

 

Written by Tony Biasotti

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_separator style=”shadow”][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][/vc_column][/vc_row]

Categories
Blog Conservation Environmental Justice Interfaces of Global Change IGEP

Birding While Black

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]

From Backpacker Magazine  |  June 4, 2020

Amber Wendler looked the part, mostly. She had the binoculars hanging around her neck, she had her eyes cast upward toward the tree canopy where birds were flitting about, and she had her ears tuned to the sound of their songs.

So when the question came from another person who was up to the same thing, it caught her by surprise: “Are you a birder, too?”

Wendler recalls no ill will from the asker, a white person, but it did reinforce a feeling that Wendler and other Black birders often feel in the outdoors. “In those spaces there aren’t other Black people,” she said. “It’s easy for Black people to feel they don’t belong in outdoor spaces.”

With birding in particular, participation skews white. According to a 2011 study by the Fish and Wildlife Service, 93 percent of birders are white with 24 percent participation across the demographic. Among the Black population, the participation is 7 percent.

The Fish and Wildlife service pins some of this on a lack of access to outdoor spaces. Those living in large cities participate at 12 percent, whereas those in rural areas bird at 22 percent (the average national participation rate is 20 percent).

But the feeling is similar in other outdoor sports. “I’m almost always the only black person in a group of people going hiking,” Wendler said.

It’s with this gap in mind that an online group of Black scientists (@BlackAFinSTEM on Twitter) started #BlackBirdersWeek, a campaign to draw attention to Black people who bird in light of a recent event in New York City’s Central Park where a white woman called the police on a Black birder.

“I’ve never seen so many other people who look like me in nature,” said Wendler, who is a first-year PhD candidate in biology at Virginia Tech. “Increasing the visibility of Black people in nature is important. It’s important for Black kids to see other people who look like them and know they belong.”

For many people, it’s hard to understand why wild spaces are de facto “white spaces,” or that access to the outdoors is limited by anything beyond a simple desire to go into them. But even those people who do go into nature often find themselves feeling like or being treated like outsiders. As Wendler said, “These events happen many times and it just happened to be caught on video this time.”

That’s what @BlackAFinSTEM is hoping to challenge. “There’s a great need to increase visibility of Black people in nature and make spaces welcoming and safe for Black people and bring to the forefront systemic racism in the outdoors and amplify Black voices in the outdoors.”

Importantly, Wendler said, the burden to fix systemic issues like this can often fall to those who are most affected by them, but Wendler said addressing systemic racism everywhere in society requires everyone’s participation.

We can start, Wendler said, by listening to Black people and their experiences, then seeking to be an ally to Black people and “make outdoor spaces welcoming and safe.”

Follow Amber Wendler’s twitter feed @amberwendler.

Written by Casey Lyons

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_separator style=”shadow”][/vc_column][/vc_row]

Categories
Blog Disease Environmental Justice Global Change Hollins Partnership Research Undergraduate Experiential Learning

GCC Partners with Hollins University to promote undergraduate research opportunities

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]From VT News | December 2, 2019

A partnership between Virginia Tech’s Global Change Center and Hollins University will continue to blossom into its third year, pairing distinguished undergraduate students with Virginia Tech professors for a summer of unique research opportunities.

Hollins University is a private, women’s liberal arts college in Roanoke, Virginia, and students who are contemplating graduate studies and environmental research careers are currently applying for the summer 2020 installment of the program on the Blacksburg campus.

Over the summer of 2019, the Global Change Center hosted Udipta Bohara, a junior majoring in biology with minors in mathematics and chemistry, and Grishma Bhattarai, a senior double-majoring in economics and mathematics. Both aspire to complete advanced degrees after graduating from Hollins. By working at Virginia Tech with professors Dana Hawley, Kendra Sewall, and Kelly Cobourn, they gained understanding about what it’s like to work closely with research faculty on complex projects.

In Hawley’s biology lab, Bohara worked on a project seeking to understand the differences in how long the bacterial pathogen Mycoplasma gallisepticum stays active in different environments. This bacterium can cause severe eye infections in songbirds, and researchers are currently trying to discern just how virulent the disease is and how long it can remain active on a birdfeeder, where it is most commonly spread. Bohara’s work involved taking blood samples from birds and swabbing bird feeders, as well as setting up and running DNA and RNA-based assays.

Udipta pipetting samples collected by swabbing a bird feeder in order to quantify how much bacterial pathogen was present on the feeder port.
Bohara pipetting samples collected by swabbing a bird feeder in order to quantify how much bacterial pathogen was present on the feeder port. Courtesy of Virginia Tech.

When first experiments didn’t go as expected, she also learned valuable skills that all successful scientists practice: how to develop alternative questions, adjust protocols, and change the scope of experiments when things don’t go exactly as planned. Kendra Sewall, an associate professor in the School of Neuroscience, noted that this kind of adjustment “is a way of coming back with another question that might be better … science is an iterative process. You’re never done.”

Bohara felt that the positive mentorship of her professors and lab team and successfully shifting her project for the second half of the summer were some of the most inspirational and exciting parts of her summer at Virginia Tech. She described it as “a life-changing opportunity.”

Chava Weitzman, a postdoc in the Hawley lab who worked closely with Udipta during her project, said, “It’s been really fun to watch Udipta’s confidence in the lab and feeling of ownership in the experiments grow over the summer.” Hawley added, “Udi’s project helped us start a whole new line of techniques in our lab. It was wonderful to have her here as an enthusiastic stimulus for trying something new, and we’ll definitely be using Udi’s assays to try for a new NSF grant in the fall.”

Bhattarai’s experiences with Associate Professor Kelly Cobourn in the Department of Forest Resources and Conservation were equally positive. Bhattarai focused on investigating food insecurity as a function of assistance programs and gender. She wondered, is food assistance more effective for male- or female-headed households? How exactly are people being helped (if at all) and does assistance improve their access to food? Bhattarai’s interest in economics and gender combined perfectly with Cobourn’s own interests in creating models to predict food insecurity in regions like South Sudan and Ethiopia.

Grishma in the Center for Environmental Analytics and Remote Sensing (CEARS) lab analyzing large datasets to explore the interaction between assistance, gender, and food security. Courtesy of Virginia Tech.
Bhattarai in the Center for Environmental Analytics and Remote Sensing lab analyzing large datasets to explore the interaction between assistance, gender, and food security. Courtesy of Virginia Tech.

Cobourn explained that “the difficult challenge as an economist is that you can’t usually design experiments. You have to work with what you’re given.” Mining the massive amounts of data from the World Bank to find the right data set became Bhattarai’s biggest challenge. “If you ask the wrong questions,” she said, “you’ll get the wrong information. You have to be sure your own biases aren’t reflected.”

Bhattarai recently presented her research at an international applied agriculture and economics conference in Atlanta. “It was the experience of a lifetime for me personally, to be surrounded by people in academia driven to solve the world’s problems with their research. It was an amazing opportunity.”

“Bhattarai has been wonderful to work with,” said Cobourn. “She’s very intrinsically motivated, energetic, and self-directed. She had a clear idea of what she wanted to do, and all I had to do was steer her toward the right questions. It’s important to recognize that being able to do all this research in two months is phenomenal.”

Bhattarai and Bohara agree that the opportunity to participate in intensive research at Virginia Tech has helped them better understand what graduate school might look like, laying a solid foundation for these students’ future careers in research. Collaborative work, positive mentorship, and exciting research made for a rewarding summer for both students.

The Global Change Center’s mission is to advance interdisciplinary scholarship and education to address critical global changes impacting the environment and society. For more information about the Hollins-GCC partnership, visit the GCC website.

“It is extremely exciting to see the positive impact that this program is having on young women who plan to pursue graduate training after finishing their studies at Hollins. I continue to be impressed by the talented and motivated students from Hollins and am grateful that they regard Virginia Tech as a place where they can obtain high caliber research training under the mentorship of our outstanding faculty. I am hopeful that this partnership will continue long into the future,” said William Hopkins, director of the Global Change Center and professor in the Department of Fish and Wildlife Conservation in the College of Natural Resources and Environment.

 

Related News: Virginia Tech’s Global Change Center and Hollins University partner to increase student careers in life science research

~Written by Jessica Nicholson and Tiffany Trent 

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

Categories
Blog Campus Seminar Announcements Climate Change Environmental Justice Food & Agriculture Global Change Newsletter Other Sponsored Lectures Special Events

Thirteenth Annual Sustainability Week kicks off

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]From VT News | September 13, 2019

The 13th annual Sustainability Week, an interactive partnership among Virginia Tech Office of Sustainability, the Town of Blacksburg, and local citizens group Sustainable Blacksburg that highlights sustainability efforts in the community and on campus, is underway.

Sustainability Week 2019 kicked off on campus on Sept. 14 with Green Tailgating at the Virginia Tech Furman University football game. More than 20 events are scheduled through Sept. 22.

As part of Virginia Tech’s commitment to sustainability, the Game Day Green Team recycling initiative hands out green recycling bags to tailgaters during home games and strives to build awareness around recycling, waste reduction, and sustainability.

Some of the other events being held during Sustainability Week 2019 on campus and in the community include:

  • Tech Sustainability Open Forum (Sept. 16, 1–2:30 p.m.): This event will provide a brief overview of Virginia Tech’s successful campus sustainability program and will seek audience ideas for continued improvement. Representatives from the Office of Sustainability, Student Affairs, and the Alternative Transportation Department will highlight current programs and initiatives and explore future opportunities. RSVP.
  • Active Commute Celebration (Sept. 19, 8 a.m.–1 p.m.): This event offers an opportunity for the Virginia Tech community to learn more about available alternative transportation options around campus. There will also be giveaways and snacks. RSVP.
  • Sustainable Eats Bike Tour – A Glimpse of Sustainable Practices at Virginia Tech’s Dining Halls (Sept. 17, 12:30–2:30 p.m.): Join the first-ever “Sustainable Eats Bike Tour.” Sample and learn more about our delicious, local, and sustainably sourced eats all while taking a scenic bike tour around campus.
  • Electric Car Display (Sept. 21, 1–3 p.m.): Join the nationwide celebration to heighten awareness of today’s widespread availability of plug-in vehicles and the benefits of all-electric and plug-in hybrid-electric cars, trucks, motorcycles, and more. RSVP.
  • And many more.

Click here to view the full schedule of Sustainability Week 2019 events.

Sustainability Week Blacksburg

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

Categories
Blog Campus Seminar Announcements Climate Change Environmental Justice Food & Agriculture Global Change Newsletter Other Sponsored Lectures Special Events

Best-selling author Roger Thurow to speak about the global food crisis

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]

From VT News | September 12, 2019

On Sept. 16, the Virginia Tech College of Agricultural and Life Sciences Global Programs Office will host best-selling author Roger Thurow for a series of public events, as part of its Global Agricultural Productivity Initiative.

Thurow is an expert on agricultural development and speaks often on high-visibility platforms related to nutrition, hunger, and agriculture in the United States, Europe, and Africa. For 20 years, he was a foreign correspondent based in Europe and Africa. His coverage of global affairs spanned the Cold War, the fall of the Berlin Wall, the release of Nelson Mandela, the end of apartheid, the wars in the former Yugoslavia, and the humanitarian crises of the first decade of this century – along with 10 Olympic Games.

In 2003, he and Wall Street Journal colleague Scott Kilman wrote a series of stories on famine in Africa that was a finalist for the Pulitzer Prize in International Reporting. Their reporting on humanitarian and development issues was also honored by the United Nations. Thurow and Kilman are authors of the book, “ENOUGH: Why the World’s Poorest Starve in an Age of Plenty.” In 2009, they were awarded Action Against Hunger’s Humanitarian Award.

Roger Thurow, a former foreign correspondent for the Wall Street Journal is noted for his writing about the politics of world hunger.

 

He is also the author of “The Last Hunger Season: A Year in an African Farm Community on the Brink of Change,” and his most recent book, “The First 1,000 Days: A Crucial Time for Mothers and Children—and the World,” was published in May 2016. Thurow joined the Chicago Council on Global Affairs as senior fellow on global food and agriculture in January 2010.

 

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_video link=”https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c2NaR606jug”][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]

Events open to the public: Sept. 16

Politics of Food Security and Nutrition: 9 – 10:30 a.m., Newman Library Multipurpose Room
The global food price crisis of 2007-08 was a wake-up call for the global community, demonstrating that the world is unprepared to sustainably produce enough nutritious food for a growing population.

Thurow will provide insights into how policymakers are addressing the complex environmental, economic, and human challenges to achieving food and nutrition security. He will also share stories about the people whose lives and livelihoods hang in the balance, including African smallholder farmers and undernourished mothers and children around the world.

This event is co-hosted by the Virginia Tech Institute for Policy and Governance and the Community Change Collaborative.

The Last Hunger Season: 12:30 – 2 p.m.,
Fralin Hall Auditorium
Africa’s small farmers are living and working essentially as they did in the 1930s. Without mechanized equipment, fertilizer, or irrigation; using primitive storage facilities, roads, and markets; they harvest only one-quarter the yields of Western farmers. In 2011, a group of farmers in Kenya came together to change their odds for success — and their families’ futures. Thurow spent a year following the progress of four women farmers in this community and recorded their struggles and aspirations in his book, “The Last Hunger Season.”

He will share the stories of these remarkable women and their determination to end the hunger season. His presentation will be followed by a panel discussion about the challenges and opportunities for smallholder farmers in Africa.

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

Categories
Environmental Justice News Pollution

Radford Arsenal Transparency and Virginia Tech Data Forge Positive Community Relations

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]

 

After decades of suspicion about what exactly is going on at the Radford Arsenal in southwestern Virginia, community relations are improving. Not only did the first ever area soil and air test results come in at safe levels, but the whole vibe at meetings is changing.

 

Emily Satterwite teaches Appalachian studies at Virginia Tech. She says, “It’s been amazing to watch over the past year, the degree to which the tone of the community meetings has shifted from police presence and combative to ‘let’s keep working together.’”

Working with several colleagues, she spearheaded a study that included third party testing of soil air, beyond the arsenal’s walls.  “It was important to everyone to make sure that whatever studies we did felt like they were not swayed by government funding sources.”  Colleague Julia Gohlke, an associate professor in the department of population health science, led a class conducting a community survey on perceptions of the place, where open burning of hazardous waste and the sounds of explosions along the river banks, have long kept people on edge.

“There’s what science would say is the risk, we call that ‘risk assessment’,” says Gohlke. “We base it on, for example, what we think a human health level of concern would be – that’s what EPA uses. But there’s also the perception of risk that we want to measure. Both actually are important ultimately, in determining health, because anxiety is a health concern as well.”

She says, “Of the people that did have a concern and got the opportunity to tell us what those concerns were, chemical discharges to the New River came out on top, and concerns about employee safety was not far behind.”

It was recently announced, the soil and air tests came back below within EPA safety standards. Two years ago, a coal fired plant on site that dates from the 1940s, closed.  This year, Lt. Col. James Scott, after persistent requests from the community, announced a state of the art contained incinerator that will cut the amount of open air burning of military waste on site by 95 percent is expected to be online in 2023.

Despite the positive reception to these developments, the arsenal’s public image is another matter.

Emma Ruby is a junior at Virginia Tech, studying political science and sociology, who worked on the community survey. Four hundred thirty-four people responded to it. “What we found is people are still worried about the arsenal. But they are seeing a positive trend in transparency (about what goes on behind its walls). They have a sense that things are getting better and that they’re being listened to by the arsenal.”

It’s important to note that the public sentiment study was done before the results of the air and soil tests were known.  Also, the students pointed out that granular public health data is not available.  For years, people have feared that there is thyroid cancer cluster in people who live near the arsenal.  It has never been proven.  Ruby explained that while there is data on the county level, “We would need data on individual zip codes” and she points out, that kind of personal health data is often private.”

Lt. Col. James Scott, who usually leads the meetings –he served as tour guide when the Arsenal invited the public and media for a 2-hour tour of the grounds— says he understands why there has long been so much suspicion and fear about the arsenal.  It stretches some 6,000 acres in Pulaski and Montgomery counties.  Located on the bank of the New River, the nitrates it releases into the water earn it the dubious distinction of ‘Virginia’s number one polluter’ every year.

“When you’re a closed facility, for security reason and for safety reasons, the things that go on here, it’s not an open facility, and no matter how much our neighbor tells us, nothing’s going on behind the fence it just I think human nature (for people to be concerned.)”

But the new transparency by the arsenal is leading to new attitudes.

Ruby noted that Lt. Col.  Scott was cited by respondents to the survey results for having a positive effect and making people feel their concerns are being heard. “

Regular attendee of the Arsenal’s quarterly meetings, Beth Spillman, applauded the efforts at more transparency and better communication, than in the past. The Arsenal now has its own Facebook page and people say that instead of quarterly meetings feeling as if they’re a chore for officials, they now seem more cordial and responsive.  She asked Scott to include the data the students gathered and to keep telling the ‘story’ of the arsenal and the community, how it’s evolving, and what new information is coming in, so that, “We have confidence that we can live in a healthy way, and be defended, and have jobs and have environmental justice. So yeah” she said, “Thank you guys.”

The students are working on a new website to continue sharing information with the community. It expected to go live, next spring.

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_separator][/vc_column][/vc_row]

Categories
Blog Environmental Justice Outreach Postcards Student Spotlight

Postcards from the field: Cristina Marcillo in Guatemala

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text] August 3, 2018
Postcard from Cristina Marcillo

[hr]

¡Hola desde Guatemala!

This July, I have been working in Guatemala conducting a drinking water monitoring study of San Rafael las Flores, home to the Escobal silver mine, and co-leading a water-monitoring workshop for citizen scientists from all over Guatemala in Chimaltenango. Since its inception, there has been strong resistance to this mine (at times resulting in physical violence) from the surrounding community, including the indigenous Xinca population. This project is funded by Virginia Tech’s Center for Peace Studies and Violence Prevention and is a collaboration between the Krometis lab group in Biological Systems Engineering (of which I am a part!) and Dr. Nicholas Copeland in Sociology, who received a Fullbright to work in Guatemala this year.[/vc_column_text][vc_gallery type=”image_grid” images=”42619,42609″ img_size=”300×300″][vc_column_text]After landing in Guatemala City, our water monitoring team was immediately whisked away to San Rafael las Flores to meet with community members and together decide on an effective drinking water monitoring plan. We sampled households in both the urban center and the rural mountainous outskirts. Most of this area relies on spring water for drinking, domestic, and agricultural use, and treatment appears sporadic. Our sampling included long days of driving and hiking to spring and surface water sources in forested mountainous areas with knowledgeable community guides. We brought with us field equipment to test for arsenic, E. coli, pH, dissolved oxygen and conductivity that allowed us to give rapid feedback on water quality. Through this experience, I was able to get an idea of the complicated distribution network the San Rafael community relies upon, learn about the physical environment influencing water quality, and better understand the community’s drinking water concerns. We will continue to be in communication with the San Rafael community as we receive lab results on their water quality.[/vc_column_text][vc_gallery type=”image_grid” images=”24630,24633,24631,24638″ img_size=”300×300″][vc_column_text]The following week, I went to Chimaltenango to teach a water-monitoring workshop with Dr. Copeland. This workshop aimed to equip citizen scientists with the knowledge they need to: 1) plan a monitoring program, 2) use field equipment to rapidly test for certain drinking water contaminants and interpret results, 3) understand the health impacts of common drinking water contaminants, and 4) begin to build a national water–monitoring network. Guatemala does not currently have a publicly available comprehensive waterbody inventory or regular monitoring of surface or spring waters. Citizen scientists from all over the country attended this workshop and left with a renewed conviction that their community can care for and monitor their own water bodies and drinking water sources.[/vc_column_text][vc_gallery type=”image_grid” images=”24635,24636″ img_size=”300×300″][vc_column_text]My primary dissertation research analyzes environmental justice impacts of US public water system compliance with the Safe Drinking Water Act, whereas this project in Guatemala looks at public water infrastructure and legislation that is less well-established and in many ways still forming. This project allows me to observe the difference in challenges in developed and developing countries’ drinking water protection efforts firsthand. It also allows me to use my engineering knowledge to work with a community that is adamant about protecting water sources from contamination. Being half-Guatemalan myself, I am excited to partake in this interdisciplinary project and see its impacts firsthand. This project will continue to evolve as we work with the San Rafael community and beyond on long-term water monitoring network.

– Cristina[/vc_column_text][vc_single_image image=”24634″ img_size=”large” add_caption=”yes” alignment=”center”][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_gmaps link=”#E-8_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” title=”San Rafael las Flores, Guatemala”][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_separator][/vc_column][/vc_row]

Categories
Blog Climate Change Environmental Justice Ideas News

Coastal cities are already suffering from “climate gentrification”

Though some may still deny it, climate change is having an effect on our lives. It’s making weather patterns more severe and unpredictable, and in some parts of the world, agricultural practices and natural ecosystems are collapsing. And in other places, it’s going to make things really expensive.

In other words, climate change will speed up the process of gentrification in coastal cities by constricting the supply of livable land, and rendering it very expensive due to scarcity. As that happens, lower-income people will struggle to remain in place. Keenan, Hill, and Gumber found ample evidence that this is already happening in Miami. The coastal city is seeing property values on high-elevation lands skyrocket, while once pricey waterfront property values are diminishing.

The most common reason this happens, Keenan says, is because real estate investors recognize the threat of climate change, and shift capital to more stable land and properties. In Miami, where higher-elevation properties were formerly more affordable (being farther from the beach)–and sites where people of color were often segregated–people are being priced out. Little Haiti, a historically lower-income Haitian neighborhood, sits about a mile back from the beach, on higher ground. Residents now are seeing investors eye their neighborhood with new interest–it remained relatively dry during the hurricanes Irma and Maria last year, and a smattering of new developments are going up. Slowly, longtime residents are beginning to feel they can no longer afford to live there, and are seeking someplace cheaper.

Residents of coastal properties are also feeling a squeeze: As climate risks to a property like flooding increase, costs for insurance and repairs go through the roof. And in places like Copenhagen, which have worked to retrofit their waterfront properties to be more resilient and developed green infrastructure that would mitigate the effects of events like flooding, these resiliency investments have raised the cost of living to the point where only wealthy people are able to afford to live there. “Even places that are really trying to do the right thing for people are making investments that have the unintended consequence of displacing the people they were trying to protect,” Keenan says.

This type of climate gentrification creates a ripple effect: As coastal dwellers defect for inland properties, they price residents of places like Little Haiti out. And those lower-income residents often find they have nowhere left to turn in their city, and are forced to leave for somewhere else. Keenan has actually found that in terms of net migration, Miami-Dade County’s domestic-born population has decreased every year for the past several years, which in the long-term, he says, will begin to reflect in the economy.
[Image: Terra]

While climate change may be inevitable, its displacing effects do not have to be. There are a number of measures cities can take to ensure that their residents remain in place, and in conditions that are livable and affordable, as they adjust to the new realities brought about by rising sea levels and other environmental challenges.

Cities could, for instance, introduce comprehensive rent-control measures in higher-elevation neighborhoods experiencing rising property values. Data analyses like the type Keenan and his colleagues performed for the study, which maps changes in property values from 1971 to 2017 against elevation and relative risk of sea-level rise, could guide cities as to where they should focus their efforts.

But also, Keenan says, real estate needs to step up to add more density to livable areas in a way that’s equitable and doesn’t bring about displacement. “Real estate owners, investors, and operators have influence, and they’re the ones that have a fairly cohesive and emergent voice on the necessity to make investments for the collective good,” Keenan says. “Climate change and gentrification is happening at the same time that we’ve reached this crescendo of lack of affordability, lack of adequate mass transportation, and just overall livability.” By making smart investments across categories that boost density, sustainability, and livability, the real estate sector could help get out in front of some of the pressures of climate change.

One developer attempting to do so in Miami is David Martin, the president of local development agency Terra, who’s collaborated with Keenan on ideas to address Miami’s climate-change woes through development. Martin’s latest project, Grove Central, will break ground in the next couple months on what was once a parking lot in the middle of Coconut Grove, a predominantly Bahamian neighborhood set a mile back from the coast. The development will house 288 residences, designated for renters earning between 60% and 140% of the county’s Area Median Income, and will connect to a train station and a planned 10-mile bike and pedestrian trail that will run parallel to the coast. It will also contain solar panels and a water-harvesting system to protect against flooding.

This type of development, Martin says, is important because it “moves density away from vulnerable coastal areas,” and creates climate-change mitigation infrastructure on what was once an underutilized slab of concrete. But it’s not enough for city developers just to throw up these types of structures and say their job is done. Alongside new developments, cities need to add equity measures to like rent control or housing subsidies to protect people fearing displacement as these new properties materialize in their neighborhoods. While Martin’s Grove Central project focuses on housing middle-income people, it will hopefully serve as a proof-of-concept that such a development could be built to house people of lower incomes, too, who are most vulnerable in the current housing market, and will only become more so as climate change accelerates.

But ultimately, Miami’s new approach–building density and green infrastructure away from the coasts–is a solid step forward. Mitigating climate gentrification, Keenan says, “comes down to inclusionary-zoning-type mechanisms that are predicated on the idea of creating density in protected areas, and having sustainable infrastructure to support that density, like mass transit and green energy.”

[hr]

Categories
Blog Climate Change Environmental Justice News

How global warming punishes the world’s poorest

From the New York Times