Categories
Energy News

Long-distance transmission of Canadian hydropower is a cost-effective complement to U.S. renewable energy transitions

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]

October 13, 2020

[/vc_column_text][vc_column_text]Department of Population Health Sciences faculty member and Global Change Center affiliate Ryan Calder released today a policy report evaluating economic and environmental costs and benefits of diverse scenarios for renewable energy transitions for the New York City Area. The report found that a proposed long-distance transmission line, the Champlain-Hudson Power Express, would likely pay for itself in terms of avoided direct and environmental costs.

Long-distance transmission lines could bring hydropower generated in Canada to markets in the US. These projects have large upfront costs, but the study demonstrates that these costs are lower than those for wind and solar.[/vc_column_text][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1/2″][vc_column_text]While New York State has ample renewable energy resources, these are concentrated Upstate. Statewide demand is driven by the New York City area where fossil fuel generation predominates. While New York State has recently pledged to decarbonize its electricity sector by 2040, this has been complicated by the early closure of Indian Point Energy Center, a nuclear power plant roughly 40 miles north of New York City.

Calder and colleagues at Duke University’s Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Mark Borsuk and Celine Robinson, undertook a comprehensive assessment of the options available to replace generation supplied by Indian Point, which will be fully decommissioned in 2021.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1/2″][vc_single_image image=”52191″ img_size=”medium” add_caption=”yes” alignment=”center” onclick=”custom_link” img_link_target=”_blank” link=”https://chpexpress.com/project-overview/route-maps/”][/vc_column_inner][/vc_row_inner][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]

The study assembled all publicly available information on environmental and direct costs and benefits for the relevant technological options (including existing legacy generators) and modeled a variety of scenarios using probabilistic simulation. Options evaluated include no action, development of a new gas plant, development of long-distance transmission from Canada and build-out of local wind and solar.

Indian Point will likely accrue roughly $17 billion in costs associated with increased output of legacy fossil fuel generators. While long-distance transmission represents an upfront investment of upwards of $3.7 billion, savings in direct and environmental costs more than outweigh this such that total costs are more than $4 billion less than no action. When paired with planned build-out of solar and wind projects, savings of long-distance transmission rise to more than $10 billion, driven in part by greenhouse gas emissions that are avoided during the many years of buildout of offshore wind.

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column width=”1/2″][vc_column_text]

Quantified environmental impacts include emissions of greenhouse gases and criteria air pollutants. Economic values were calculated for both of these endpoints for each of the energy scenarios evaluated. Both long-distance hydropower transmission and development of wind and solar have large climate and local air pollution benefits. Long-distance transmission of hydropower avoids roughly 100 million tonnes of CO2 equivalents by 2050 (economic value of approximately $4.5 billion) and thousands of tonnes per year of diverse air pollutants (economic value of approximately $100 million).

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][vc_column width=”1/2″][vc_single_image image=”52194″ img_size=”full” add_caption=”yes” alignment=”center”][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]The study also quantified likely local economic activity associated with different energy scenarios. All energy investments are likely to stimulate on the order of billions of dollars of economic output and thousands of jobs. Long-distance hydropower would likely generate over 5,000 job-years, while development of offshore wind would likely generate over 25,000 job-years.

The report will be published by the Nicholas Institute of Environmental Policy Solutions at Duke University. An advance copy has been made available by the authors on ResearchGate.[/vc_column_text][vc_separator style=”shadow”][/vc_column][/vc_row]

Categories
Blog Energy Global Change

$3 million investment provides boost to university energy efficiency efforts

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]From VT News | February 24, 2020

Over $3.1 million in approved funding will help Virginia Tech amplify its energy conservation efforts over the next year.

The investment will continue to catalyze the university’s Five-Year Energy Action Plan, a comprehensive blueprint to improve energy efficiency and reduce energy costs within five years in the 50 most energy-intensive, “energy hog” buildings on the Blacksburg campus.

In the first four phases of the Energy Action Plan, the university has reduced its carbon emissions by approximately 23,000 tons per year and saved more than $2.3 million in equivalent annual energy costs.

The plan is swiftly approaching full integration — and expected to yield more than $6 million in overall energy cost savings.

When the Office of Energy Management within the Virginia Tech Facilities Department conducted an energy benchmarking analysis of buildings on the Blacksburg campus in 2015-16, it discovered 50 buildings accounted for more than 70 percent of overall university energy costs; that is just 35 percent of all buildings on campus.

The Energy Action Plan combines energy data analysis with energy accounting and retrofitting projects to achieve significant energy cost reductions. Since 2016, four phases of the Energy Action Plan have been implemented with 10 new energy-intensive buildings incorporated into each phase.

One of the cornerstones of the Energy Action Plan is leveraging data to optimize energy usage to achieve energy efficiency at scale on campus. Ten new buildings are added to the university’s energy management platform during each phase. New smart meter infrastructure also continues to be installed in campus buildings. These efforts, paired with ongoing energy audits in the field, enable practitioners to identify energy consumption patterns in real time to optimize lighting, ventilation, heating, and air based on demand.

Also under the plan, ongoing retrofitting projects, especially in laboratories – largescale energy contributors on campus – continue to help improve energy efficiency in energy hog buildings.

“As we approach the final phase of the of the initial Energy Action Plan, energy conservation remains at the forefront of all Facilities Department activities at Virginia Tech. Through efforts like the Energy Action Plan, award-winning sustainability program, and strong environmental standards for new and existing construction, we will continue to make headway in our energy reduction and sustainability efforts,” said Christopher H. Kiwus, associate vice president and chief facilities officer.

Among the proposed projects under Phase 5 (2019-20) of the Energy Action Plan are:

Implementation of energy retrofit projects identified in Phase 4, which include:

  • LED lighting overhaul in a range of buildings.
  • Lab ventilation optimization.
  • Retro-commissioning of HVAC energy systems.
  • Power plant compressed air system optimization.
  • Integration of 10 additional energy-intensive buildings into the university’s energy management platform.
  • Ongoing meter replacement and maintenance.
  • Implementation of rooftop solar project at the Sterrett Facilities Complex.

“It is an undeniably exciting time to be at Virginia Tech, and this rings especially true as it relates to sustainability. Current initiatives like the Energy Action Plan and revisions to the Climate Action Commitment are strong indicators of the university’s long-term engagement in environmental stewardship. We will continue to work collaboratively in seeking out new opportunities to invest time, knowledge, and financial resources in pursuit of a more sustainable society,” said Dwayne Pinkney, senior vice president and chief business officer.

The  Climate Action Commitment is the university’s guiding framework around sustainability and energy efficiency in campus operations, facilities, curriculum, and research. In continued commitment to sustainability, President Tim Sands recently called for  renewal of the commitment.

A working group of university leaders across operations, academics, research, students, and community representatives are currently examining Climate Action Commitment goals to ensure the most rigorous sustainability standards are implemented.

Energy efficiency is a connecting theme among the subcommittees tasked with delivering recommendations for the commitment’s latest iterations.

For example, the Energy Opportunities subcommittee is reviewing progress and opportunities around energy efficiency as they relate to the campus steam plant, on-campus chiller plantsVirginia Tech Electric Service, and energy demand reductions conducted throughout the year by the Facilities Department.

Similarly, the Buildings Opportunities subcommittee is striving to deliver recommendations that build upon the successes of the Five-Year Energy Action Plan by investigating new ways to boost energy efficiency in new and existing buildings on campus.

Exploring renewable energy opportunities, including solar, biomass, and wind on Virginia Tech properties — and through new partnership building — is central to the efforts of the Renewable Energy Opportunities subcommittee.

The latest information around Virginia Tech’s sustainability achievements, including updates to the Climate Action Commitment, will be shared in the Virginia Tech Daily.

More information about the Climate Action Commitment revision process, working group, and subcommittees may be found here.

Please  click here to learn more about the Five-Year Energy Action Plan. For specific questions on the plan, please contact the Office of Energy Management at 540-231-6348.
Related links

 

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]