Categories
Ideas News

Leading the green charge: PhD student introduces new lab sustainability program to campus

From VT News

March 28, 2018  |  Ph.D. student Ellen Garcia shuts the sash on a chemical fume hood. When left open, chemical fume hoods consume as much energy as three-and-a-half households per day. Shutting the sash when not in use is one way laboratories can be more sustainable.

Much of that waste — from plastic foam to packaging — could easily be recycled, reducing the waste stream from a lab and ultimately saving energy and money for research programs. Apart from waste reduction, there are many other green actions a lab can implement to foster sustainability.

All that’s needed is someone to spearhead the green charge.

Ellen Garcia stands in front of the glass doors of a fume hood.
Laboratory waste isn’t the first thing you think of when considering scientific research, yet research laboratories generate approximately 5.5 million tons of waste per year, according to a 2016 Nature article.

At Virginia Tech, that someone is Ellen Garcia, a Ph.D. student in Daniela Cimini’s laboratory at the Biocomplexity Institute.

In December of 2016, Garcia met the founders of My Green Lab, a nonprofit based in California working to provide sustainable solutions for research laboratories and manufacturers. Deeply inspired by My Green Lab, Garcia returned to the institute determined to implement changes.

“Many sustainable practices,” Garcia notes, “are simple changes in behavior. It really just takes someone noticing and making an effort to foster change.”

These changes have included reducing energy consumption by regularly turning off lights and taping over light switches powering unnecessary lighting; in-your-face reminders to turn off equipment, including vacuum lines, when not in use; and streamlining waste disposal to decrease the amount of plastic containers used. In most cases, people have to simply be encouraged and reminded to do something until it becomes a new habit.

One change that has a large impact on the energy consumption of laboratories is raising the temperature of super-cooled freezers from the standard -80°C to -70°C, a temperature which still preserves specimens but uses far less energy. Another change with big impact is to close the sash on chemical fume hoods. These fume hoods use as much energy in one day as three-and-a-half households. With the sash shut, energy consumption is slashed in half.

Researchers can also order their supplies from companies with sustainable practices. Corning, for instance, recycles its packaging free of charge to the consumer. Garcia has managed to divert at least 30 pounds of packaging from the waste stream by working with Corning. The Biocomplexity Institute now has recycling options available to all its research labs for Corning plastic packaging, as well as pipette tip boxes from any manufacturer, thanks to a program from Fisher Scientific.

Among the many resources My Green Lab offers is a green lab certification process, which is recognized as the standard for sustainable laboratory practices across North America. In one year, Garcia was able to obtain a silver-level green lab certification, meaning that 60-69 percent of lab actions are considered sustainable.

The Cimini lab is not the only one to take action. Thanks to efforts from Garcia and the research operations team, the Biocomplexity Institute has implemented a unique plastic foam recycling program.

“The amount of Styrofoam we have diverted from the landfill in only a few months fills an entire stock room,” Garcia noted.

Inspired by Garcia’s program, other labs at Virginia Tech are working toward more sustainable lab practices throughout campus.

Allison Paradise, executive director of My Green Lab said, “The impact of Ellen’s work is truly inspiring. She stands out as a leader in the green labs movement, and through her actions she has demonstrated how one person can transform laboratory operations on a campus. Less than two years after Ellen’s lab became the first Certified Green Lab at Virginia Tech, the university is now considering launching a campus-wide program aimed at reducing the environmental impact of labs. It’s incredible – she’s doing all of this while getting her Ph.D. Imagine what would happen if graduate students around the country followed Ellen’s lead. Life science research would be forever changed.”

To learn more about My Green Lab and sustainable lab practices, attend the 15th Annual Virginia Tech Laboratory Exposition from 10 a.m. to 2 p.m. April 3. Allison Paradise will provide morning and afternoon presentations on lab sustainability. For more information or to register, visit the Lab Expo website. Vendors will be encouraged to promote their sustainable products, and lunch will be provided for registrants.

[hr]

Categories
Accolades Conservation Ideas New Publications News

Human-centered design is key to forming partnerships for large-scale conservation success

From VT News

March 22, 2018  |  To recruit more fishers to help with marine conservation, cast a wider net.

This is the conclusion of a new study by Virginia Tech researchers who examined participation in a payment for ecosystem services program.  The study modeled preferences of fishers in Chile in creating and monitoring marine protected areas inside their fishing management zones.

Lead author Michael Sorice, an associate professor of conservation social science in the College of Natural Resources and Environment, and his colleagues found that more fishers voted in favor of adopting the program when it was designed to incorporate their preferences and when they had a reasonable expectation of good outcomes for the fishery.

“We call this approach where participants’ needs are given the same weight as the resource’s needs during the design phase of the program, ‘human-centered design,’” said Sorice, who is also affiliated with the university’s Global Change Center, an arm of the Fralin Life Science Institute. “It can help minimize costs by building programs that are seen as desirable at the outset.”

Boats by a harbor
Small-scale fishers mainly use diving gear and these deckless boats to harvest inshore finfish, benthic invertebrates, and algae. Photo courtesy Mike Sorice.

The findings, published in PLOS ONE on March 9, question previous assumptions in the field that the payments themselves are the most effective motivator of participation.

“Similar to the way consumers make purchasing decisions, voluntary conservation programs are value propositions,” said Josh Donlan, founder and director of Advanced Conservation Strategies and co-author on the study. “While payments are important, fishers also consider other costs and benefits they expect to occur and then decide whether their overall wellbeing would be improved.”

The human-centered design approach works by attracting fishers who may be otherwise uncertain or unenthusiastic about the payment program. Their study found that desirable programs were better able to attract fishers who thought the program was a good idea, but who might have low trust that the conditions exist to make it happen. They also found that fishers who were not sure it is a great idea were more willing to participate based on program adjustments like shorter enrollment periods.

Kevin Boyle, co-author and a professor of agricultural and applied economics in the College of Agriculture and Life Sciences at Virginia Tech, said that these results indicate that small program design changes that reduce fisher uncertainty are keys to successfully casting the wider net.

The team surveyed a total of 168 fishers across 12 fishing associations in central Chile, all of which have functioning territorial user rights (TURFS) assigned by the Chilean government. The TURF-reserve program was described to respondents as a marine biodiversity conservation program in which businesses, organizations, and agencies interested in protecting marine biodiversity, either for philanthropic purposes or to offset environmental impacts elsewhere, would provide the fishing association with an annual cash payment to set aside 15 hectares of their fishing territory as a no-take protected area.

Fishers were informed that an independent nonprofit organization would be created to administer the program, and that, while the fishing association would actually receive the cash payment, each member would receive a portion.

“For a lot of these fishers, fishing is more than money, it’s a way of life. Programs that provide a better fit to their way of life will be more likely to be successful and grow,” said Stefan Gelcich, a co-author on the study and professor of natural resource management at the Center of Applied Ecology and Sustainability at Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile.

[hr]

Categories
News Pollution Uncategorized Water

Ocean plastic predicted to triple within a decade

From CNN

Categories
Blog GSO Outreach Schools and science fairs

IGC Fellows encourage kids to “dress like a scientist” at elementary school science fair in spring 2018

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]The Interfaces of Global Change Graduate Student Organization returned for an evening of outreach fun for the annual Gilbert Links Elementary School science fair on March 15, 2018. Fellows organized and hosted a photo booth experience for kids at the fair, themed “Dress Like a Scientist”. Children explored field and lab gear, and learned that you don’t have to have fancy equipment to be a scientist!

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_media_grid element_width=”6″ grid_id=”vc_gid:1532352811071-9ee31ad9fc608f4da6e7cf8b01640939-5″ include=”24313,24316,24317,24314″][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_separator style=”shadow”][/vc_column][/vc_row]

Categories
Climate Change GSO Interfaces of Global Change IGEP Seminars, Workshops, Lectures

IGC Fellows host workshop with Antoine Michon to explore the UN Paris Agreement and more

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]

March 20, 2018

The Interfaces of Global Change Graduate Student Organization organized a workshop held last Friday, March 16, as part of a professional development activity and requirement for the IGC Graduate Program.  The workshop for IGC Fellows included guest speaker, Antoine Michon, the current security council deputy coordinator for the French mission team at the United Nations in New York.  Previously, Michon was the head of the environment division where he worked closely on the Paris agreement and with the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).

The second part of the workshop was also joined by Dr. Carol Franco, Senior Research Associate in Virginia Tech’s Department of Forest Resources and Environmental Conservation.  Dr. Franco has provided technical support for the Dominican Republic’s delegation to international climate talks since the 2009 U.N. Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen and has been attending such meetings as a delegation member since the 2012 conference in Doha, Qatar.  Dr. Franco is leading multiple efforts at Virginia Tech to secure funding for the development of an international climate change program, including a study abroad program addressing climate change and policy in the Dominican Republic.

 

The workshop began with a brief presentation by Michon about the Paris Agreement, followed by discussion focused on:

  1. Why an international agreement on climate, how it was achieved and what’s next?
  2. What does it mean for the US to opt out of the agreement?
  3. What are the actions taken by France?

Several reading materials were provided to IGC Fellows in advance to prepare them for the open discussion in the second part of the session, which centered around the questions:

  1. How can scientists better communicate and influence the public and policymakers?
  2. The negotiation process: how to reach consensus among 197 countries?

 

Kudos to the IGC GSO organizers for coordinating a great workshop experience!  

The impact of the event is most effectively summarized through reflections shared by several IGC Fellow participants:

 

I really appreciated getting to hear a behind the scenes perspective on how the Paris Agreement came to be. It’s hard to conceptualize how so many countries’ scientists, negotiators, diplomats, and statesmen can come together to draft such important legislation from what you hear from news reports. Hearing directly from Antoine left me impressed not only with the event itself, but all of the leg work that the French organizers put into making everything come together. It was really a unique experience!    

– Brandon Semel, IGC Fellow

[hr]

I took a course on climate change policy last semester taught by Dr. Carol Franco that centered around the history and future of the Paris Agreement and the annual UNFCCC Conference of the Parties, which was incredibly helpful in preparing me for this workshop. As an environmental diplomat for the host country (France), Antoine had a big part in planning and helping to mediate the Paris Agreement in 2015 and he provided some really interesting insight into all of the hard work that went into this.

I am interested in alternative career paths for biologists outside of academia and it’s clear that Antoine thoroughly enjoys his position as a diplomat. It was great to learn about the opportunities and challenges that he faces in that role. What stood out to me most from this experience was the human element of the negotiation process. As Antoine described late night debate sessions fueled by coffee and last minute resolutions reached during hallway huddles of the elite, I could sense the intensity and excitement that emanates from such environments and it made me want to experience it myself.

As scientists in training we generally try to operate in the realm of rationality and objectivity, but writing these policies involves so many conflicting requirements and values that they can’t be approached so simply. Taking part in these types of discussions with IGC helps me to realize this and to consider ways to overcome some of the obstacles that policy makers face.  

– Kerry Gendreau, IGC Fellow

[hr]

Antoine gave us an insider’s perspective on the PCA negotiation; my favorite moments were when he joked about aspects of the diplomatic process, such as when he said that exhaustion of negotiators was part of the French presidency’s strategy, because people start to agree to things when they are tired, so that was why they held so many late-night back-channel meetings!

Antoine is very charismatic and came across as sincere. Interacting with him gave me a deeper understanding of how complicated policy-crafting is and why it may seem (to scientists) that it progresses so slowly. After this workshop, I have more trust in the negotiation process and better appreciation for what diplomats do – we may not get to a solution I like, or get to a solution very quickly, but I feel reassured that there are good people working very hard to enact global climate reform.

I was also relieved to learn that from Antoine’s perspective, the US saying it will pull out of the PCA had the opposite effect that some had feared: it actually spurred other countries to reaffirm their commitment to PCA and ratify the agreement quickly. The one exception might be Russia; Antoine wonders if part of the reason they have not ratified is because the US says it will back out.  

– Mary Lofton, IGC GSO Vice President

[hr]

Antoine’s visit was extremely helpful, it was fascinating to hear about all the work that was behind the scenes leading 197 countries to come on board and accept an agreement on climate issues that held everyone accountable. In my opinion, many factors contributed to making the PCA successful, such as following the bottom-up approach versus the top-down, erasing the differentiation between the developed and underdeveloped countries and rather differentiate countries by their carbon dioxide emission rate, and lastly, treating countries equally and being fair to everyone. Overall, I learned many skills that I can implement as a scientist to become a successful honest broker in my field.

The presence of Dr. Carol Franco really helped us learn about the role of scientists in the negotiation process. I learned that we can be scientists and provide results that show the current status of the effect of the global change, and at the same time play a role in the negotiation process as well.  

– Fadoua El Moustaid, IGC GSO Professional Development Committee Chair

[hr][/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

Categories
Campus Seminar Announcements Climate Change Global Change Other Sponsored Lectures

Friday, March 23: Mapping Climate Change Vulnerability Hotspots to Anticipate Migration and Resettlement

Please mark your calendar for the upcoming interdisciplinary speaker series presentation organized by Coastal@VT: 
Dr. Alex de Sherbinin 
Mapping Climate Change Vulnerability Hotspots
to Anticipate Migration and Resettlement 
Friday, March 23
11am – 12pm
Assembly Hall, Holtzman Alumni Center
 
Dr. de Sherbinin is Associate Director for Science Applications at the Center for International Earth Science Information Network (The Earth Institute at Columbia University) and the Deputy Manager of NASA Socioeconomic Data and Application Center. He is renowned for his work on climate change vulnerability mapping and population migration, urban resilience, environmental indicators, and remote sensing applications for environmental international agreements.  You can view de Sherbinin’s bio and CV on Columbia University’s site here.
Categories
Ideas Interfaces of Global Change IGEP Other Sponsored Lectures

IGC Fellows enjoy conversations over breakfast with Dr. Trevor Hancock

One reward of studying as a Fellow of the Interfaces of Global Change program is the opportunity for in-depth experiences with visitors to the university beyond the seminar auditorium.  Dr. Trevor Hancock visited campus last week to share his presentation titled “How do we live in good health in the Anthropocene?”, hosted by the Fralin Life Science Institute as part of the Ecological and Human Health in Rural Communities Seminar Series.  Dr. Hancock is a public health physician and health promotion consultant, a Professor and Senior Scholar at the School of Public Health and Social Policy at the University of Victoria, and one of the founders of the Healthy Cities and Communities movement.

A breakfast invitation for IGC Fellows to join Dr. Hancock allowed for both stimulating conversation and hearty nourishment to kickstart their day.  Topics over breakfast included ideas for reducing the carbon footprint of cities, addressing relationships between mental health and obesity trends to urban sprawl, and Hancock’s “one world region” notion.  Our health as human beings is directly influenced by our basic needs of food, water, shelter and energy.  As an increasingly urbanized species, how can we steer our communities to adapt in innovative ways that bridge the benefits of the natural world to our daily lives within built environments?

Dr. Hancock writes for a weekly column for the Times Colonist, Victoria’s daily newspaper, about population and public health issues.  Column topics focus on broad ecological, social, political, economic and commercial determinants of the health of the population and the role of public health professionals and organizations in protecting and improving the health of the population and preventing disease and injury.

One of his recent articles cites growing trends in the medical community for negative perceptions of general practitioners, described by some as “undemanding and easy” when compared to the work of specialty practitioners.

Hancock reflects, “what I think is really going on here is a wider phenomenon, found across many professions and disciplines, rooted in a societal tendency to value specialism over generalism. This attitude fails to recognize that generalism, perhaps better described as holistic thinking, is a specialty in its own right.  Rather than knowing more and more about less and less, holistic thinkers know about a great many different things, and work to synthesize and integrate them, looking for what anthropologist Gregory Bateson called “the pattern that connects.

Many of the challenges we face in the 21st century are complex, cut across and involve many sectors, and interact as complex systems. They cannot be solved by narrow specialists, who indeed might make the problem worse. We need people trained in holistic thinking who understand complex systems and how to manage them.”

More information about Dr. Hancock and links to his column writings are found on his website at https://trevorhancock.org.

[hr]

Categories
Climate Change News

Rapid Arctic warming and melting ice are increasing frequency of blizzards in the Northeast, study finds

From the Washington Post

Three blockbuster winter storms have bombarded the Northeast this month. Meanwhile, Arctic sea ice fell to record low winter levels. Temperatures, in the dead of winter, rocketed to the melting point at the North Pole, nearly 60 degrees above normal.

All of this wild weather is tied together,  part of a trend, and linked to climate change, a study published in the journal Nature Communications finds.

The study, titled “Warm Arctic episodes linked with increased frequency of extreme winter weather in the United States,” shows that severe winter weather, late in the season, has increased over the eastern United States since 1990 as the Arctic has dramatically warmed, faster than any other part of the world.

When the Arctic is warm, the study finds, cold weather and heavy snowfalls in the eastern United States are two to four times more likely than when it is cold.

“This paper argues that the weather was cold not in spite of climate change but likely because of climate change,” said Judah Cohen, lead author of the study.

Connecting what’s happening in the Arctic with weather in the mid-latitudes is a relatively new area of study and has, at times, proved controversial. But Cohen, director of seasonal weather forecast at Atmospheric and Environmental Research, said the statistical significance of the connection found in this analysis was very robust. “I think that’s an important outcome of the work,” he said.

Al Gambale clears snow on Cottage Street in Boston. The Boston area was hit with its third nor’easter of the month Tuesday, a storm that brought powerful gusts and more than a foot of snow. (Michael Dwyer/AP)

The study investigated changes in an index of the severity of winter weather in different U.S. cities and how they were related to Arctic weather patterns. In short, the authors found that when the Arctic region was cold and air pressures were low, it was cold in the western United States and mild in the eastern United States. But when the Arctic was warm and pressures were high, it was mild in the West and cold in the East.

As Arctic temperatures have warmed in recent decades, late winter weather severity has increased in the East while decreasing in the West, the study found.

Because the increase in winter weather severity in the East has been most pronounced in February and March, when the biggest winter storms tend to form, major East Coast cities have seen an uptick in the frequency of crippling snowstorms. “We found a statistically significant increase in the return rate of heavier snowfall in Boston, New York  and Washington,” Cohen said.

Figure from study shows return intervals (y axis) of snowstorms of different amounts (x axis) for two periods. The period since 1990 is shown in green, when the Arctic has warmed the most. The period prior, from 1950 to 1989, is portrayed by the blue line. Where the lines are bold, the result is statistically significant. (Nature Communications)

In fact, from D.C. to Boston, the majority of the top 10 biggest snowstorms on record  have occurred since 1990, while weather records date to the late 1800s.

The study also shows that in cities in the West, such as Salt Lake City and Seattle, big snowstorms have become less frequent.

The study found that episodes of severe winter weather in the East were typically preceded by a sudden warming of the Arctic from the surface through the stratosphere as well as a split in the polar vortex, the zone of frigid air encircling the Arctic high altitudes. Such a vortex split shifts cold air normally centered over the Arctic over eastern North America and/or Europe.

Cohen said the vortex split led to the recent parade of nor’easters as well as the severe outbreak of cold and snow in Europe, dubbed the “Beast from the East.”

Daniel Swain, a climate scientist at the University of California at Los Angeles not involved in this work, said the Cohen study was consistent with work with which he has been involved, that has shown an increasing tendency for a cold-East, warm-West pattern during winter in recent decades.

“It’s also striking that these changes have coincided with substantial climatic upheaval in the Arctic, where accelerated warming has recently caused sea ice to drop to record lows,” Swain said in an email. “While I think the jury’s still out regarding whether these Arctic changes are actually causing this particular instance of extreme variability in the mid-latitudes, a growing chorus of recent evidence suggests that the Arctic can indeed influence weather in distant regions (at least under some circumstances).”

Michael Mann, director of the Earth System Science Center at Penn State University, and not involved in the study, called the overall findings “sound.” But he pointed out that other factors, besides Arctic warming, are probably behind some of the trends in winter severity.

“For example, increased snowfalls in the northeastern U.S. (and Mid-Atlantic) are in part reflective of warmer ocean temperatures and stronger coastal storms,” Mann said via email, “which produce stronger nor’easters like we’ve seen this season, with larger snowfall totals.”

Cohen, separately, said he agreed that warmer oceans should boost snowfall totals but that the study shows polar vortex disruption in the Arctic is the biggest trigger for cold and snow in the East.

The next knot for scientists to untangle is to figure out exactly how the warming Arctic causes polar vortex disruption. Cohen and others have proposed conceptual models that link the disruption to declining Arctic sea ice and other factors, but this is still a matter very much under investigation.

[hr]

Categories
Blog Climate Change Environmental Justice News

How global warming punishes the world’s poorest

From the New York Times

Categories
News Research Undergraduate Experiential Learning

Paleontological Opportunity for Undergraduates: Petrified Forest National Park, Summer 2018

The Virginia Tech Paleobiology Research Group is looking for 3 undergraduate students to participate in a field expedition in search of early dinosaurs and other reptiles in Upper Triassic strata (~215 million years old) in Petrified Forest National Park (mid- May to early June, 2018). These paid positions include: one summer scholar at Petrified Forest (10 weeks) and two scholars that will be part of a two-week expedition to the park. All three scholars will interact in early summer and will continue their research into the Fall 2018 semester.

This is a fieldwork-based position in which participants will be part of a science team within a national park. In addition, participants will help prepare fossils and will participate in public outreach on site and at Virginia Tech. This is an excellent opportunity for students to gain experience in basic geological interpretation, field exploration, collection techniques, fossil preparation, and an introduction to solving paleontological problems.

Applicants should have a background in geoscience or biology, but other sciences will be considered. Additionally, the applicant must not be graduating in 2018 (including December). Completed applications must be sent by April 1st at noon EDT to Dr. Sterling Nesbitt (sjn2104@vt.edu) and Dr. Michelle Stocker (stockerm@vt.edu). Applications can also be obtained from Dr. Sterling Nesbitt.

Full Application Information here: PEFO Jones Undergraduate application 2018 final