Categories
Climate Change

Government report says climate is warming and humans are the cause

FROM NPR

It is “extremely likely” that human activities are the “dominant cause” of global warming, according to the most comprehensive study ever of climate science by U.S. government researchers.

The climate report, obtained by NPR, notes that the past 115 years are “the warmest in the history of modern civilization.” The global average temperature has increased by about 1.8 degrees Fahrenheit over that period. Greenhouse gases from industry and agriculture are by far the biggest contributor to warming.

The findings contradict statements by President Trump and many of his Cabinet members, who have openly questioned the role humans play in changing the climate.

“I believe that measuring with precision human activity on the climate is something very challenging to do,” EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt said in an interview earlier this year. “There’s tremendous disagreement about the degree of impact.”

That is not consistent with the conclusions of the 600-plus-page Climate Science Special Report, which is part of an even larger scientific review known as the fourth National Climate Assessment. The NCA4, as it’s known, is the nation’s most authoritative assessment of climate science. The report’s authors include experts from leading scientific agencies, including the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, NASA and the Department of Energy, as well as academic scientists.

The report states that the global climate will continue to warm. How much, it says, “will depend primarily on the amount of greenhouse gases (especially carbon dioxide) emitted globally.” Without major reductions in emissions, it says, the increase in annual average global temperature could reach 9 degrees Fahrenheit relative to pre-industrial times. Efforts to reduce emissions, it says, would slow the rate of warming.

“This is good, solid climate science,” says Richard Alley, a geoscientist at Penn State University, who says he made minor contributions to the report’s conclusions on sea level rise. “This has been reviewed so many times in so many ways, and it’s taking what we know from … a couple of centuries of climate science and applying it to the U.S.”

The assessments are required by an act of Congress; the last one was published in 2014. Alley says this year’s goes further in attributing changes in weather to the warming climate, especially weather extremes. “More heat waves and fewer cold snaps, this is very clear,” he says. The report also notes that warmer temperatures have contributed to the rise in forest fires in the West and that the incidence of those fires is expected to keep rising.

Some of the clearest effects involve sea level rise. “Coastal flooding, you raise the mean level of the ocean, everything else equal you get more coastal flooding,” Alley says. The report notes that sea level has risen 7 to 8 inches since 1900, and 3 inches of that occurred since 1993. The report says that rate is faster than during any century over the past 2,800 years.

The report also points out that heavy rainfall is increasing in intensity and frequency across the U.S., especially in the Northeast, and that is expected to keep increasing.

Other connections are harder to nail down, Alley says, such as whether a particular hurricane can be attributed to climate change.

“The Climate Science Special Report is like going to a doctor and being given a report on your vital signs,” says environmental scientist Rachel Licker of the Union of Concerned Scientists. She notes that the authors assessed more than 1,500 scientific studies and reports in making their conclusions.

Alley adds that the new report “does a better job of seeing the human fingerprint in what’s happening.” He says that while he hasn’t read all of it yet, he sees no evidence that it has been soft-pedaled or understates the certainty of the science.

Alley notes that “there’s a little rumbling” among climate scientists who are concerned that the Trump administration will ignore this effort. “I think the authors really are interested in seeing [the report] used wisely by policymakers to help the economy as well as the environment.”

The report has been submitted to the Office of Science and Technology Policy at the White House. Trump has yet to choose anyone to run that office; it remains one of the last unfilled senior positions in the White House staff.

Categories
Biodiversity Climate Change News

Hurricanes in 2017 pushed rare island species closer to the brink

From National Geographic

By Justin Nobel

As Hurricane Irma slammed into south Florida in September, Dan Clark, manager of a complex of four national wildlife refuges in the Florida Keys, had evacuated and was at his mother’s house near Tampa. His eye was on the weather and his mind was on the multitude of plants and animals that inhabit the unique refuge system he oversees, which includes the well-known Key Deer National Wildlife Refuge.

There are about 20 federally endangered species in the Keys, and many of them exist nowhere else on Earth. “The dang eye of the hurricane tore right through the prime habitat for many of our most at-risk species,” said Clark.

One animal of particular concern was the Key deer, a charismatic, small subspecies of the white-tailed deer. Key deer were nearly eradicated by poaching during the 1950s, when the population dropped to 25. North America’s smallest deer, the animals rarely weigh more than 95 pounds and stand about three-feet tall at the shoulder. They live only in the Florida Keys.

“The deer can swim well, even in a storm surge situation, but not in 130 miles-per-hour winds,” said Clark.

According to Clark, there is no typical hurricane response for the deer. “With Irma,” he said, “I imagine they did everything from hiding behind garages to hunkering down in bunches of vegetation to running wildly through the street—it worked out well for some, it worked out poorly for others.”

Thanks to a survey conducted after Hurricane Irma by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and Texas A&M University, and released in mid-October, we know just how well: About 14 to 22 percent of the Key deer population, which is estimated to be about 1,000 deer, was killed by the storm. Deer were found crushed by debris and impaled by wind-blown objects.

“If you are in the eye of a hurricane and you are wildlife,” says Clark, “it’s like Dorothy’s house: you are going to get thrown around.”

KIDDIE POOLS TO THE RESCUE

But deer that survived the storm faced new threats. To live on these low-lying islands, where the height across much of the deer’s habitat is a mere three feet above sea level, the animals need freshwater. Normally, they get that from freshwater marshes and holes in the coral rock. But Irma’s storm surge washed over much of the core habitat for Key deer, inundating critical watering holes with salty ocean water. About five days after the storm, the first refuge biologists returned to Key Deer National Wildlife Refuge. Seeing the lack of freshwater for animals, they improvised a unique solution: kiddie pools.

A fleet of fire trucks and police and refuge vehicles delivered about a dozen of the store-bought blue plastic pools, roughly the size of a small trampoline, to key locations between Sugarloaf Key and Big Pine and No Name keys. The pools also provided freshwater for other species, such as butterflies, dragonflies, and the endangered Lower Keys marsh rabbit.

“We don’t take the decision to do something like this lightly,” said Clark. “The refuge is not a zoo, and we would prefer not to habituate wildlife to people. But based on the data we collected, the amount of overwash was significant enough that freshwater resources were limited.”

Read the full story at National Geographic.

[hr]

Categories
New Publications Research

Even small amounts of oil made birds sick near Deepwater Horizon spill

From VT News

Photos from the Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill on April 20, 2010, show heartbreaking images of deceased or soon-to-be-deceased sea life—birds, fish, sea turtles, and mammals coated in thick, black grime.

However, even small amounts of oil exposure affected the health of birds in the Gulf of Mexico, according to a Virginia Tech research team. Their findings were published Oct. 12 in the journal Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry.

The team examined samples shipped to them from hundreds of birds — a mix of American oystercatchers, black skimmers, brown pelicans, and great egrets — in the months following the spill. Blood samples taken by first responders showed that individuals exposed to small amounts of oil from the spill suffered from hemolytic anemia, a condition that occurs when toxins enter the bloodstream and damage red blood cells that carry oxygen to tissues. Anemia can affect growth, alter organ function, reduce reproductive success, increase risk of disease, and even cause death in birds.

The research team’s findings could not be published until now because they were used in the legal settlement that was finalized in 2016, in which the oil company BP was ordered to pay state and federal natural resource agencies $8.8 billion for restoration efforts.

“Our findings suggest that adverse effects of oil spills on birds are much more widespread than estimates based on avian mortality or severe visible oiling,” said co-author William A. Hopkins, a professor of wildlife in the College of Natural Resources and Environment and director of the Global Change Center at Virginia Tech. “Because remarkably small amounts of oil exposure injured birds in the gulf, our research changes the way we think about ecological damage from oil spills and influences how we document adverse effects after future spills.”

Hopkins is an expert in wildlife ecotoxicology, studying how environmental stressors impact animals’ physiological processes, such as reproduction, thermoregulation, and immune function. His past research has examined adverse effects of environmental pollutants on the physiology of diverse wildlife species. His work involves collaboration with state and federal agencies, as well as industry, and includes numerous high-profile chemical spills and natural resource damage cases, including the historic Tennessee Valley Authority coal fly ash spill in nearby Tennessee and a massive release of mercury from an industrial site in the Shenandoah Valley.

Jesse Fallon spent countless hours in the laboratory analyzing blood samples as they were shipped to Blacksburg from the Gulf of Mexico. Photo by Nicole Newman.

Jesse Fallon, of Morgantown, West Virginia, a doctoral student in Hopkins’ lab in the Department of Fish and Wildlife Conservation, was the first author on the paper. Fallon is also a practicing veterinarian who received his D.V.M. from the Virginia-Maryland College of Veterinary Medicine before pursuing his Ph.D. with Hopkins. He determined which physiological parameters would be most valuable to quantify in exposed birds during early development of the project, developed the sampling protocols, and trained teams on proper sample collection and handling.  Fallon spent countless hours in the laboratory analyzing blood samples as they were shipped to Blacksburg from the Gulf of Mexico.

“Even birds with relatively limited exposure to oil from the Deepwater Horizon spill sustained damage to circulating red blood cells and had evidence of anemia,” Fallon said. “Our results help scientists, industry, and government agencies understand the far-reaching effects of the Deepwater Horizon spill and will inform future damage assessment efforts.”

The research represents a coordinated collaborative effort with the federal government, as well as with first responders, animal rehabilitation facilities, and research teams from other institutions that were encountering oiled birds. Other co-authors include Eric P. Smith, a professor in the Department of Statistics at Virginia Tech; Nina Schoch, James D. Paruk, Evan A. Adams, and David C. Evers, from the Biodiversity Research Institute; Patrick G.R. Jodice with the U.S. Geological Survey’s South Carolina Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Institute and Clemson University; Christopher Perkins with the Center for Environmental Sciences and Engineering at the University of Connecticut; and Shiloh Schulte with Manomet.

The research was funded by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.

[hr]

Story by Lindsay Key