Categories
Announcements

GCC Advisory Committee sees transition with new members

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]

August 21, 2020

Several Global Change Center faculty members have recently completed terms on the GCC Advisory Committee.  Please join us in thanking Julia Gohlke, Leigh-Anne Krometis, and Mike Sorice, who have provided extraordinary service over the past two years!

Welcome Sally Entrekin, David Haak, and Leah Johnson, who will serve through 2021!

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1/3″][vc_separator style=”double” css=”.vc_custom_1597703213177{margin-top: 3px !important;}”][/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1/3″][vc_column_text]

Current GCC Advisory Board Members

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1/3″][vc_separator style=”double” css=”.vc_custom_1597703218869{margin-top: 3px !important;}”][/vc_column_inner][/vc_row_inner][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row css=”.vc_custom_1597703237650{margin-top: -2px !important;margin-bottom: -2px !important;}”][vc_column][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1/3″][vc_single_image image=”39412″ img_size=”150×150″ alignment=”center” style=”vc_box_rounded” css=”.vc_custom_1598027072912{margin-bottom: 2px !important;}”][vc_column_text]

Bill Hopkins

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1/3″][vc_single_image image=”35972″ img_size=”150×150″ alignment=”center” style=”vc_box_rounded” css=”.vc_custom_1598027141402{margin-bottom: 2px !important;}”][vc_column_text]

Brian Badgley

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1/3″][vc_single_image image=”45945″ alignment=”center” style=”vc_box_rounded” css=”.vc_custom_1598359956830{margin-bottom: 2px !important;}”][vc_column_text]

Kelly Cobourn

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1/2″][vc_single_image image=”34558″ img_size=”150×150″ alignment=”center” style=”vc_box_rounded” css=”.vc_custom_1598031444192{margin-bottom: 2px !important;}”][vc_column_text]

Kendra Sewall

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1/2″][vc_single_image image=”38281″ img_size=”150×150″ alignment=”center” style=”vc_box_rounded” css=”.vc_custom_1598031514527{margin-bottom: 2px !important;}”][vc_column_text]

Brian Romans

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column_inner][/vc_row_inner][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1/3″][vc_single_image image=”45402″ alignment=”center” style=”vc_box_border” border_color=”sky” css=”.vc_custom_1598030787896{margin-bottom: 2px !important;}”][vc_column_text]

Sally Entrekin
New member[/vc_column_text][/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1/3″][vc_single_image image=”34364″ alignment=”center” style=”vc_box_border” border_color=”sky” css=”.vc_custom_1598030796707{margin-bottom: 2px !important;}”][vc_column_text]

David Haak
New member[/vc_column_text][/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1/3″][vc_single_image image=”44762″ alignment=”center” style=”vc_box_border” border_color=”sky” css=”.vc_custom_1598030748421{margin-bottom: 2px !important;}”][vc_column_text]

Leah Johnson
New member[/vc_column_text][/vc_column_inner][/vc_row_inner][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]

A special thank you to these outgoing Advisory Committee members!

We deeply appreciate your time, energy, and balanced guidance in this leadership role. 

[/vc_column_text][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1/3″][vc_single_image image=”50912″ img_size=”150×150″ alignment=”center” style=”vc_box_border” css=”.vc_custom_1598359969317{margin-bottom: 2px !important;}”][vc_column_text]

Julia Gohlke

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1/3″][vc_single_image image=”43262″ img_size=”150 x150″ alignment=”center” style=”vc_box_border” css=”.vc_custom_1598359977158{margin-bottom: 2px !important;}”][vc_column_text]

Leigh-Anne Krometis

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1/3″][vc_single_image image=”38294″ img_size=”150 x150″ alignment=”center” style=”vc_box_border” css=”.vc_custom_1598359983661{margin-bottom: 2px !important;}”][vc_column_text]

Mike Sorice

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column_inner][/vc_row_inner][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_separator color=”black” style=”shadow”][/vc_column][/vc_row]

Categories
Biodiversity Blog Conservation Faculty Spotlight Global Change Science Communication Uncategorized Water

One fish, two fish: merging marine animal tracking with fishing fleet movements

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]

VT News | August 19, 2020

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]

 

The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations estimated in 2018 that 34.2 percent of the world’s fish stocks were overfished, a worrying trend that has significant impacts on ocean environments and the fishing industries that utilize them.

Satellite technology has increased the capacities of researchers and scientists to collect data about marine animals while tracking the movements of commercial fishing vessels, two crucial drivers in the effort to maintain a healthy ocean ecosystem.

Virginia Tech collaborated with Stanford University and Global Fishing Watch to host “Fish and Ships,” an online workshop connecting researchers from around the world to discuss ways in which the merging of these two data sets might answer critical questions about human impacts on ocean biodiversity and sustainability. Participants brainstormed research approaches on overlapping species habitat maps with the data for national fishing fleet positions and discussed how emerging technologies can better model ocean dynamics.

“We’re in a new age in fisheries management,” said Assistant Professor Francesco Ferretti, of Virginia Tech’s College of Natural Resources and Environment, who coordinated the workshop. “Just a few years ago we had to rely mostly on what the fishers were telling us. Now we have a huge amount of data from satellites that track marine fishing vessels. From that data we can use models to track, predict, and characterize fishing operations around the world.”

Much of the fishing vessel data discussed was provided by Global Fishing Watch, which used the automatic identification system to track the movements of approximately 70,000 industrial fishing vessels from 2012 to 2016, resulting in the first “footprint map” of fishing fleet movement around the world. This map provides a crucial perspective on both the reach of commercial fishing and what drivers are potentially influencing the industry.

At the same time that fishing vessels are “pinging” data about where they are fishing, electronic tags on broad-ranging fish, such as tuna, swordfish, and sharks, are giving scientists new information about the movements of marine animals across the world’s oceans.

“We’re starting to do overlaps of these two data sets to see how much they cross paths,” explained Ferretti, a faculty member in the Department of Fish and Wildlife Conservation. “One goal is to develop a landscape of interactions so we can understand the ways that fishing impacts fish populations. From that information, we can go further, perhaps developing guidelines to help manage the fishing industry and provide data that will improve its efficiency while allowing ocean marine animal populations a chance to recover.”

Ferretti notes that workshop participants particularly enjoyed the opportunity to work collaboratively: “This first workshop has been a great success. We created a consortium of more than 70 scientists from academic institutions, national and international management bodies, and nongovernment organizations, all willing to play ball in making the ocean a more transparent place to use resources and benefit from its services.”

The July workshop served as the kickoff meeting; Virginia Tech is planning to host a second workshop to address the inventorying and integration of large data sets and ongoing analyses.

“We are currently taking steps to invite all these scientists to Virginia Tech,” Ferretti said. “While COVID will likely impact our plans, we are considering numerous hosting options, from our Innovation Campus in Washington, D.C., to our marine facilities on the Chesapeake Bay, to our beautiful campus in Blacksburg. The goal will be a full immersion into the technical aspects of the projects brainstormed during the kickoff meeting.”

Ferretti noted that Virginia Tech has a role to play in protecting and preserving our oceans and hopes that the Fish and Ships venture will prove to be a flagship project towards that effort. The Department of Fish and Wildlife Conservation is currently bolstering its research and educational opportunities in marine fisheries, ecology, and conservation.

“We are a technical university, and right now the ocean requires technical solutions,” said Ferretti, who is affiliated with the Global Change Center housed in Virginia Tech’s Fralin Life Sciences Institute. “There is a great deal of marine technology being developed to understand our oceans better, and Virginia Tech can play a big role in that domain.”

 

Written by David Fleming

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

Categories
Biodiversity Blog Global Change IGC Interfaces of Global Change IGEP Postcards Research Water

Postcard from a Fellow: Daniel Smith’s summer obsession with flumes, fake roots, and Psych

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]

By Daniel Smith |  August 9, 2020

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]Hi GCC community and friends! Daniel Smith here; I’m a fourth year PhD candidate within the Biological Systems Engineering (BSE) Department and I’ve been an IGC fellow since spring 2019. While at Virginia Tech, my research has focused on how plant roots protect streambank soils from fluvial (water) erosion.  I am interested in understanding which plant root processes/mechanisms have the most influence on streambank erosion. I’m excited to share some of the tools I have been using and testing out this summer that will be used to measure soil erosion in my future experiments.

First, let me introduce the epic, room-sized (26 ft long by 3 feet wide) flume. This flume, housed in ICTAS II (the Institute for Critical Technology and Applied Science), was designed and built to represent water flow within a stream channel. However, a major distinction must be acknowledged between the manmade flume and a natural streambank. The bottom and sides of this flume are made out of smooth, plexiglass material while streams typically have rough bed sediments and grainy bank soil. Many streams also have visible plant roots growing along the streambank face, adding an extra layer to the grainy soil material.  Consequently, to measure the effect of plant roots on streambank erosion in the flume, I need to better represent the boundary conditions found in natural streambank settings.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_single_image image=”50732″ img_size=”full” add_caption=”yes”][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]Part of this modification was already done from a previous student’s research project. That student built four “flume inserts” made out of a wooden frame and 1-inch thick PVC sheeting. Sand particles were glued onto the PVC sheets, giving them a grainy texture, and a hole was cut into one of the panels so a soil sample could be placed there for erosion testing. For my experiment, I worked with Allen Yoder in the BSE department to make the testing holes larger, replace some broken and/or missing parts, and fix any worn out sections of the frame. Once inside the flume, these updated walls would represent streambank soil that had no vegetation.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column width=”1/2″][vc_single_image image=”50729″ img_size=”large” add_caption=”yes”][/vc_column][vc_column width=”1/2″][vc_single_image image=”50763″ img_size=”large” add_caption=”yes”][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]While the sand wall is a good representation of an unvegetated streambank, I still needed something that matched vegetated streambank soils with roots facing the stream channel.  As a result, more PVC sheeting had to be purchased, cut to the correct size, and covered in sand particles. To represent the roots of grassy plants, I decided to use different diameters of flexible, 100% polyester thread. Here’s the fun part: given the size of my PVC sheets, field data from another study revealed I would need ~1500 roots glued onto each insert in order to match what was typically found in the field!  Armed with a hand drill, scissors, thread, and E6000 glue, I drilled 200 holes into each PVC sheet, cut and tied different thread diameters together, and individually glued these fake root bundles into each hole. Once complete, these walls can be drilled on top of the sand wall inserts when I am testing rooted soil planted with grassy-type vegetation. Between the tediously long hours of cutting and gluing, I’ve been able to watch multiple documentaries and an unknown amount of the show Psych![/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_single_image image=”50898″ img_size=”full” add_caption=”yes”][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]But wait…there’s still more! The sand walls will be used to test erosion in unvegetated soil samples and the polyester threaded walls will be used to measure erosion in soil samples planted with grassy vegetation. What about the woody plants?  You guessed it– I’ll need to make another set of walls with fake root material that represents woody (e.g. more rigid) roots. Once that task is completed, I will run some preliminary tests in the flume to make sure the walls are working as desired before the real experiment starts. Needless to say, by the end of this summer, it’s likely that I’ll have watched so many episodes of Psych some of them will start blending together in my head…[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_single_image image=”50741″ img_size=”large” add_caption=”yes”][vc_single_image image=”50738″ img_size=”large” add_caption=”yes”][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column width=”1/3″][vc_column_text]In addition to the glorious and time-consuming task of gluing near 800 root bundles (~6000 fake roots in total), I am also taking care of some real plants this summer in the Hahn Horticulture Garden greenhouses. My future experiment will look at using switchgrass (Panicum virgatum) and silky dogwood (Cornus amomum) to represent grassy and woody plant roots. This summer I am testing to see how they grow in these PVC pipe chambers to see if any modifications will need to be made later. So far things are growing nicely![/vc_column_text][/vc_column][vc_column width=”2/3″][vc_single_image image=”50767″ img_size=”large” alignment=”center”][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_separator][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column width=”1/4″][vc_single_image image=”44646″][/vc_column][vc_column width=”3/4″][vc_column_text]Daniel Smith is an Interfaces of Global Change fellow working with Dr. Tess Thompson in Virginia Tech’s Department of Biological Systems Engineering. He is studying how plant roots and soil microorganisms impact streambank soil resistance to fluvial erosion.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_separator style=”shadow”][/vc_column][/vc_row]

Categories
Accolades Announcements Blog

Bill Hopkins named associate executive director of Fralin Life Sciences Institute

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]

From VT News  |  August 11, 2020

William Hopkins will join the Fralin Life Sciences Institute at Virginia Tech as associate executive director, effective immediately.

In his new role, Hopkins will assist Matt Hulver, executive director, and his leadership team as they develop and implement the vision and strategic directions for the Fralin Life Sciences Institute to tackle grand life science challenges at the interface of the environment and the human condition.

Hopkins will assist Hulver in identifying strategic opportunities that leverage and capitalize on existing expertise and infrastructure at Virginia Tech. Hopkins is also the founding director of the Global Change Center and the director of the Interfaces of Global Change Interdisciplinary Ph.D. program.

“Hopkins is a dynamic and compelling leader whose passion for the institute’s research and expertise in tackling global change will energize faculty, students, and staff, ” said Hulver.

The Fralin Life Sciences Institute at Virginia Tech a strategic university investment committed to improving the human condition by supporting life sciences research, education, and outreach across Virginia Tech and the world.

“Since joining Virginia Tech about 15 years ago, I have witnessed the positive impact that our investment institutes have on the research enterprise, experiential learning, graduate training, and translational outcomes.  I’ve seen these impacts firsthand, as the Fralin Life Sciences Institute has had a tremendous influence on my own career and the careers of dozens of my colleagues,” said Hopkins. “I am excited to take on this new role where I can give back and help support an organization focused on some of the most pressing global challenges of our time, such as climate resiliency, invasive species, and infectious diseases, with the institute’s talented faculty and staff.”

Hopkins’ specific duties will also include identifying opportunities for fostering an inclusive environment and attracting faculty from diverse backgrounds to the life sciences at Virginia Tech, fostering faculty collaborations within and among the centers as well as with other faculty teams, pursuing philanthropic opportunities with the Advancement office, and serving as a member of the Fralin Life Sciences Institute Stakeholders Committee.

Hopkins’ research program at Virginia Tech, which focuses on physiological ecology, conservation, and wildlife ecotoxicology, will be moving to Steger Hall. Hopkins studies how wildlife respond physiologically and behaviorally to global threats, including climate change, habitat loss, pollution, and pathogens. His current active extramural research funding exceeds $2.2 million and current sources include the National Science Foundation, multiple state and federal agencies, and foundation grants.

Hopkins has published nearly 200 peer-reviewed manuscripts and book chapters on subjects pertaining to wildlife conservation, pollution, and physiological ecology.

The Global Change Center will also be moving to be administratively housed at Steger Hall. This will consolidate current operations from Latham Hall, Fralin Hall, and Litton Reaves to greatly enhance the center’s efficiency.

At Virginia Tech, Hopkins has taught undergraduate courses in Wildlife Biology; Tropical Ecology and Conservation; and Ecology, Evolution, & Conservation in the Galapagos. At the Graduate level, he has taught Vertebrate Physiological Ecology, the Global Change Seminar courses, and the Global Change Capstone course.

Hopkins is a professor in the Department of Fish and Wildlife Conservation  in the College of Natural Resources and Environment at Virginia Tech. He holds additional adjunct associate professor appointments with the University of Georgia’s Odum School of Ecology, the University of Tennessee, and Purdue University.  He has received the Alumni Award for Excellence in Research, the Outstanding Graduate Mentor Award from the Graduate School, and twice received the Outstanding Faculty Award for undergraduate teaching, mentoring, and advisement from his home department.

Hopkins is passionate about using the best available science to inform public policy and sound decision-making. He has served as a member of three National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine committees on contentious issues related to coal mining, water resources, and rural health in Appalachia.  And, Hopkins recently chaired a fourth National Academies committee focused on data quality in the federal government.

He has been a key scientific contributor to five of the U.S. Department of Interior’s Natural Resource Damage Assessment and Restoration (NRDAR) cases, including those surrounding the B.P. oil spill, the T.V.A. ash spill (Kingston, Tennessee), the Olin Superfund site (Saltville, Virginia), the South River mercury spill (Waynesboro, Virginia), and the Los Alamos National Lab in New Mexico. In all five NRDAR cases, he worked effectively with multiple stakeholder groups, including industry, state government, federal government, local concerned citizens, NGOs, private consultants, and other academic institutions. He also regularly serves in advisory capacities at the local, state, national, and international levels on issues pertaining to waste management, water resources, sustainability, and the global decline of amphibians.


CONTACT:
Kristin Rose Jutrus
(540) 231-6614

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_separator][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_separator style=”shadow”][/vc_column][/vc_row]

Categories
IGC IGCoffeeConvo Interfaces of Global Change IGEP

IGCoffeeConvo with Jennifer Russell: Creating a circular economy in the era of COVID-19

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]

Written by Caleb O’Brien

July 30, 2020

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column width=”5/6″][vc_column_text]

The COVID-19 pandemic has given Jennifer Russell some small reasons for hope.

Russell, an Assistant Professor in the Department of Sustainable Biomaterials and Global Change Center affiliated faculty-member, studies the circular economy, a radical reimagining of our current prevailing economic model.

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][vc_column width=”1/6″][vc_single_image image=”50561″][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]

In today’s linear economy, resources are grown or mined, converted to goods, and then disposed of in waste or (sometimes) recycled. In contrast, a circular economy “is restorative and regenerative by design and aims to keep products, components, and materials at their highest utility and value at all times,” according to a Google and Ellen MacArthur Foundation report.

“What I take hope from is that, as long as I’ve been working in this space… there has been a resistance to change on the grounds that, ‘if it’s not broken, you don’t need to fix it,’” Russell says. But during COVID, “we didn’t have a choice; we were forced to do things differently… we proved that we are capable of change, and change might not be all bad. Should we choose to learn from it, we’ve proven that change can be a good thing.”

Russell met with four IGC graduate fellows on July 29 in the latest socially-distant incarnation of the IGC Coffee Convo—an informal opportunity for graduate students and faculty to interact, share, and build community.

But because the gathering took place in a cyber Zoom-scape in lieu of a coffee shop, the only reference to coffee came when Russell held aloft two reusable coffee cups to illustrate the danger of rebound effects in sustainability efforts: As reusable items become fashionable (and brand-able), people risk accumulating so many that they might offset the sustainability gains from avoiding the single-use equivalent.

Rebound effects are among the myriad ramifying complexities inherent to efforts to establish a circular economy in the United States. “The economy is embedded within society,” Russell said, “so overhauling the economy can have huge impacts on society.”

These linkages across systems is a key focus of the GCC. And after nearly two decades engaging with the circular economy as a consultant and a researcher, Russell has a deep “appreciation for the interdisciplinary approach for finding a solution.” That emphasis on interdisciplinarity and cross-system connections was manifest in the research interests of the graduate student participants in this IGC Coffee Convo—Joshua Rady, Rebecca O’Brien, Caleb O’Brien, and Devin Hoffman—who peppered Russell with questions about her work, discussed the relationships between their own research and the circular economy, and brainstormed ideas for youth outreach opportunities.

Some of the biggest challenges for implementing circular-economy approaches in the US identified by Russell are overcoming the incumbent economic model’s “entrenched tools and ways of thought,” grappling with human psychology, and challenges of accurately measuring important circular-economy metrics. But there is some evidence that change might be on the horizon. For example, recent legislation advanced by two congressional democrats would require manufacturers to fund recycling efforts instead of taxpayer-funded (and cash-strapped) municipalities.

And although health is the highest priority during a pandemic and single-use items are appropriate during an emergency, Russell highlighted instances of circular-economy approaches to medicine that could serve as models for a retooled healthcare system in the United States. For example, in 2018 an Australian hospital successfully diverted 600,000 kg of waste from landfill. And in Europe, a novel business model is supplying reusable surgical implements such as scalpels to hospitals, which might not have the space or infrastructure to sanitize, test, and repackage implements in-house.

On more a personal level, Russell’s work has highlighted some of the ways individual consumers can support a circular economy, such as being thoughtful about the packaging of their purchases and opting for items that can be repaired. And her research has led her to practice what she preaches: “I’m repairing my own things,” Russell says. “I’m learning how to sew; I repaired a toilet.”

But there are, of course, downsides to all that knowledge, Russell says: “It takes me a lot longer to go grocery shopping than it should.”

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_separator style=”shadow”][/vc_column][/vc_row]